Thank you for sharing this
@vous99 and honestly, we were surprised too. When we read the decision, we were just as indignant as you are. It doesn't feel right that a request can be turned down for not being "urgent enough," especially when we did everything correctly and in good faith.
To be clear with everyone: this is the first time we've seen the court reject a case on these grounds, it wasn't about any problem with the file or Vadim's situation, only about the timing relative to his current permit's expiration in November. We don't agree with that reasoning, and that's exactly why we've already filed the appeal.
We won't pretend this is easy, with these cases, it's genuinely hard to predict how a judge will rule, and at times it can feel like the courts lean toward AIMA's position rather than looking closely at each person's circumstances. We know how stressful and frustrating that uncertainty is, for you and for all of us going through this together.
We will do our best to revert it and keep fighting.