Ohio Advocates for Medical Freedom

Children’s Health Defense picked up Health Director Vanderhoff’s discriminatory and coercive school exclusion order. OAMF President Stephanie Stock will be on CHD TV with Dawn Richardson from the National Vaccine Information Center to discuss this on Wednesday morning! —————- “Ohio’s new policy forcing healthy, unvaccinated children out of school for 21 to 25 days after a confirmed case of measles or rubella is drawing fire from parents, lawyers and scientists.” “The policy, part of a public health order signed in February by Ohio Department of Public Health (ODH) Director Bruce Vanderhoff, is enforceable even if the unvaccinated student shows no signs of illness or infection.” “Jeffrey Tucker, president and founder of the Brownstone Institute, called the policy “cruel and discriminatory” and a violation of the rights of children and their parents or guardians.” “If the policy is to protect the unvaccinated children, the parents should be the ones to decide,” Tucker said.” “Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), said the “contrast between medical freedom and medical tyranny is blatant” in the policy, which he said “discriminates against people based on medical choice … with zero evidence that they pose a risk.” “That could put those children “at serious risk of vaccine injury,” according to Ohio Advocates for Medical Freedom, which called for the “immediate repeal” of the policy.” “In a letter to leaders and members of the Ohio Senate and House of Representatives, the group said Ohio’s policy amounts to a “coercion tactic to bully parents into submitting to vaccination against their conscience out of desperation.” “Most families will be unable to find solutions to keep their unvaccinated children at home for several weeks or months, the letter noted.” “Leslie Manookian, president of the Health Freedom Defense Fund, agreed that the policy appears deliberately designed to “coerce busy parents into vaccinating

A special thank you to the Krissy and Beth and the many residents of East Palestine who shared their time, their experiences, and their stories with us! For more than three years, these families have lived with the consequences of the derailment while continuing to ask difficult questions and seek answers about what happened in their community. We are grateful to every resident who attended our “Right to Know” Town Hall, spoke with us, asked questions, and trusted us enough to share what they and their families have experienced. Your voices are the reason this conversation matters. Your stories deserve to be heard, your questions deserve answers, and your community deserves accountability. Thank you for welcoming us, speaking up, and continuing to advocate for your families and your community. East Palestine residents have the RIGHT TO KNOW. 🎥 If you weren’t able to attend, watch and share the recording so this information can reach more people... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIRBzNqaloI https://www.facebook.com/share/v/19RKBs9Xde https://x.com/OhioAMF/status/2098524033755283837

OAMF statement on Acton’s FALSE attack AD claiming Vivek ran an “Alzheimer’s pump & dump sceme”: Vivek’s main business model was developing drugs abandoned by big pharma. His parent company, Riovant, had subsidiary companies that worked on various drugs: Myovant (endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and prostate cancer), Urovant (overactive bladder), and Immunovant (immunological conditions) All of these had great treatment success. —-THE TRUTH—- Acton’s ad focused on Axovant, which developed an Alzheimer's drug which did fail. What She purposefully does NOT say is that 99% of ALL Alzheimer's drug trials have failed. In fact, the vast majority of experimental drugs never make it to approval. Industry research estimates that roughly 90% of drug development programs fail to reach approval. Succeed or fail, clinical trials are one of the most important parts of modern medicine. For adults and children with serious illnesses, a clinical trial can mean access to a treatment that could save or improve life, AND they are vital in helping us make informed decisions on what medical products may or may not be right for us or our children. —-THE LIE—- Acton claimed Vivek “peddled a drug to Alzheimer's patients that didn't work" and "sold stock in the company just before the drug failed a clinical trial, walking away a billionaire." This is a LIE and is trackable from public filings and disclosures. (See comment section for graphic and links. Roivant owned 75,000,000 Axovant shares before the June 2015 IPO and still had ALL of them in 2018.) Vivek’s parent company Roivant, NEVER SOLD a single share of Axovant at any time BEFORE the Alzheimer's trial FAILED, and neither did Vivek. Vivek took the loss and moved forward to develop drugs that have helped adults and children live better lives. —THE CONTRAST—- While Vivek was analyzing clinical data and working towards developing monoclonal antibodies and other treatments that would save lives from Covid, Acton worked with the B

Good ideas don’t require force. So why do vaccine manufacturers need to spend so much much money to try to FORCE parents to vaccinate? Is it because they don’t have sufficient science to prove their products are actually “safe & effective”? Sounds like a vaccine marketing problem, not a vaccine exemption problem. ———————————— “Pfizer paid $500,000 to two nonprofits that later signed a letter urging Massachusetts lawmakers to eliminate the state’s religious exemption from mandatory childhood school vaccinations, according to the company’s own public grant disclosures and a legislative letter reviewed by The Defender.” “The drugmaker’s “US Medical, Scientific, Patient and Civic Organization Funding Report” for fiscal year 2024, posted on Pfizer’s transparency website, lists a $400,000 payment to the American Society for Meningitis Prevention (ASMP) for “Policy Efforts for comprehensive Meningococcal Meningitis Vaccination.” “The same report lists a $100,000 payment to the March of Dimes Foundation in 2024, categorized as a “Vaccine Policy Campaign Maternal Immunization.” “More than a year later, both organizations’ names appear among roughly two dozen signatories on a June 1 letter to the Massachusetts House Committee on Ways and Means urging lawmakers to advance House Bill 2554 (H.2554).” “The bill would “remove the non-medical exemption from required school vaccines and enhance data collection and sharing to better track immunization rates,” according to the letter.” “Massachusetts currently allows parents to opt their children out of school vaccination requirements on religious grounds. The bill would eliminate that option, leaving only medical exemptions.”