Replymessage unavailable
It’s completely pointless to explain here what LP, YT, PT, etc., entail. The fact is that, as an LP holder, you simply didn’t lose any money and you were receiving some yield. If you felt that other protocols offered more, you should have gone there instead of whining here now and being greedy. As you surely know, when you take a YT position, your investment is worth zero at maturity (but you earn a lot of points). So it’s clear that if the point system here doesn’t work, it’s quite logical that at least the original YT investments were returned, because YT holders actually lost whole those funds in fact.....again cUSD and LP holders they didn't lose anything. And since there was no profit here, those are also lost opportunity costs, same same. So if you're asking for some additional compensation for LP and cUSD holders, then YT holders must receive the same additional compensation as well. I don't like how they handled it either, but at least this way, no one really lost out on anything.