14 July 2026
id 1941958937text not yet in the index
Only use Discord for tickets, there are impersonators on Telegram
KatalysterOnly use Discord for tickets, there are impersonators on Telegram
Wow, I almost fell for it because some people here wrote that discord server was removed 😱
id 1941958937Could you please help me get access to the server as the link does not work for me. I always get an error message when trying to join.
you can no longer join the DC server, and the DC chat channel has been deleted.
JoeJoeyou can no longer join the DC server, and the DC chat channel has been deleted.
Discord hasnt been deleted. We’re moving all community conversations here and using Discord for support tickets
Hey team, credit where it's due first: Ben's "On the Stabledrop" post owned the mistake directly, and the claim site shipped on the date given. I'm writing as someone who's been in Frontier since early, still providing 6 figures in LP, and referred 7 figures to Cap. I want this protocol to work, which is exactly why I want to lay this out properly here instead of doing it publicly on my X account.
First the context, in Cap's own words:
Jan 19/20: "All Frontier program participants will be rewarded in cUSD."
Jan 27: Homestead marketed with "If you missed qualifying for the Stabledrop, this is your next chance."
Jan 30 (Ben): "No $CAP airdrop - we're airdropping stablecoins to Frontier program users."
Feb 4: Total fixed at 12M cUSD with exact published rates: 0.000027772 cUSD per cap, 0.000021267 per COG. Everyone could compute their payout to the cent.
Feb 6: ICO delayed, and the drop reaffirmed the same day: "As planned as before, the stabledrop will occur after the ICO."
Discord (Weso): "The stabledrop is happening regardless of the ico results," and on funding: "Cap has also done previous raises."
Apr 15: "fully committed to delivering it."
Jul 10: Cut to $4.2M, eligibility rewritten to YT-at-loss only. cUSD holders and Pendle LPs: 0.
This is wrong (not just disappointing, wrong!!!) on so many levels:
1. It's retroactive. Feb 4 put a dollar price on every point. People sized, locked, and held capital for 5 months on those numbers, and that TVL was shown to Aave, Binance, Bybit, and institutional partners. Rewriting eligibility after the capital did its job is unacceptable.
2. "No-loss" only holds if LPs and holders don't exist. We earned 0 to 1.4% while carrying contract risk, mint fees, and IL, when 5-15% was available elsewhere with the same (or lower) risks. That spread over 5 months was the price we paid for points you had priced in dollars. We did lose.
3. The funding ceiling is self-imposed. Your own team confirmed in Discord MULTIPLE TIMES that the dr
3lixbt (🗣,🤝)Hey team, credit where it's due first: Ben's "On the Stabledrop" post owned the mistake directly, and the claim site shipped on the date given. I'm writing as someone who's been in Frontier since early, still providing 6 figures in LP, and referred 7 figures to Cap. I want this protocol to work, whi
An extremely clear message that is sound from every perspective.
Given the community's response and the total loss of trust in the team behind CAP, I believe the best approach is to find a fair compromise.
For instance, why not give up a portion of the unsold equity to fund an airdrop for those who helped CAP reach a TVL of $480M by January 2026?
By doing so, you would essentially be paying out of your own pockets for a "communication error" (to avoid calling it a scam) that you committed. I think this could genuinely restore the community's trust by demonstrating that the mistake was made in good faith.
3lixbt (🗣,🤝)Hey team, credit where it's due first: Ben's "On the Stabledrop" post owned the mistake directly, and the claim site shipped on the date given. I'm writing as someone who's been in Frontier since early, still providing 6 figures in LP, and referred 7 figures to Cap. I want this protocol to work, whi
He I disagree that LPs adn cUSD holders should get compensation...for what? After all, they didn't lose their money, and they were getting some kind of yield. Real compensation has to be only for YT holders.....as as you can see there was no profit, YT holders received only initial investment........so dont expect any compensation if YT holders did not get any extra......