Hyperborean Perspective

Finally, we are starting to get somewhere. By “exposing” you, sir, I meant that if we ever debated in a different setting (formal, call, etc…), you would be having a pretty hard time engaging with the substance, even the meta-level talk. As I said, when you employ technical jargon, that only impresses people who haven’t really read any philosophy. You are being overly and unnecessarily pretentious with the terminology. See, how I guessed that you were indeed invoking the terms in an idiosyncratic way, thus I asked you to define them and you never did that, sir. I don’t know why you would redirect me to the older posts to look at the different idiosyncratic definitions of nature, given that I told you what I meant when I invoked it. Once again, this is me being extremely generous and allowing you to even have this type of semantical framework and theory of meaning. Now, regarding this “parasitic caste”, notice how you completely ignored what I inquired of you? I had to assume what you meant by “parasitic caste” in my previous message, sir. I still don’t know what you take it to be, but I will be more than happy to provide an extrapolation of my response, since you clearly did NOT understand it. I don’t have any particular disagreements with the concept of “parasitic caste”, on the contrary, the way you talk about it, it seems to be referring to the current degenerate state of being. I don’t disagree with that. What I provided a contention against specifically is that because of this parasitic caste existing, we wouldn’t have organic developments obtaining. I don’t take that to be plausible and I’m quite skeptical, that’s why I asked for you to motivate and justify it. I agree with your additional statement about the parasitic caste, but they are not relevant to the discussion at hand. Sir, obviously when you make this type of response against my statement which included a noble quote from Savitri Devi, I will take that as a contention or an attack relation. I still don’t see the relevance of you bringing up Devi’s other supposed affirmed frameworks to try and invalidate the quote somehow? I agree with the reasons you list for people being lemmings. (not relevant to my statement however) Yes, that’s why I said that we haven’t had natural selection for a thousand years. Obviously it’s not just environment, but yes, that would be the main and most significant reason. In relation to man and his faculties and developments, I take race to be the primary determinant of the most kinds of faculties (neurocognitive, psychological, etc…) If you want to say that there is something more about the developments and it’s related to spirituality, I don’t necessarily disagree, but make sure it aligns well with our current established races and state of affairs. I strongly disagree with Evola’s concepts of “race of the soul” and “race of the spirit”. Lastly, you restating that because your ideas are getting censored, that somehow is proof for organic developments not obtaining because of the parasitic caste, which I already asked you to motivate and justify. Reviewing everything, you have a couple of burdens on the table, the first one being to motivate and justify the parasitic caste not allowing organic developments to obtain. The second one is, after fulfilling the first burden, give an argument of how your specific scenario is evidence, and backtrack to my statements about probabilistic evidence. Brothers, despite us not having proper natural selection for so many years, this parasitic caste is definitely not stopping us from having it now. Mobilize, get educated, and turn into fanatical warriors of National Socialism. The eternal laws of Nature are rooted in our worldview, that’s why we have no choice but to embrace them and STRUGGLE to get them back.