Hyperborean Perspective
Replymessage unavailableСсылка
click to show
click to show
One of his attack angles was trying to make me do something like this:
https://blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2011/07/why-did-112-take-russell-and-whitehead.html?m=1
Before accepting any argument as a proof.
There are some hypotheses in Philosophy that can be invoked to attack any epistemological framework, but without providing an alternative (or a stronger alternative), making them a lesser degree of proof. For example, nihilism doesn't justify itself.
Engaging at that level of detail wouldn't justify the effort under these circumstances, especially given the obvious disruptive and malignant intent of the shill.