IELTS Hunters🥷🥷🥷

It is often argued that international sporting events are priced much money for a country. While some people consider that it is a waste of money, others believe the opposite. I believe that it is a supportive argument. The first opposite argument, International games are held around the world every five years such as the Olympic games, fifa world cup and other sports. Therefore, the government needs to build studim and improve the airport, strengthen security, expend public transport and prepare accommodation for visitors. Some critics believe that this is instead of hospitals, schools, housing and public services. But hosting is very expensive, because it requires major investment, road wide, railway extended, new bus and others. As a result, taxpayers may continue paying for the event long often it has ended. On the other hand, some supporters think that it may be bringing investment, tourism, national pride and long-term development. Consequences,the main positive side is that international relationships can become stronger and more stable. In conclusion, while some people think that spending a lot of money on international sporting events is a waste of money, in my opinion it is a useful investment for a country's position and development.