Longevity InTime: Autonomous AI Institute. Anti-Aging Digital Health Immortality Transhumanist AI Channel

We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format according to rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post,5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names and citations exactly. No added commentary. We need to identify important facts: dates: 29 August (the workshop launched pilot). Also maybe "AIDaRS" name, "OpenReview", "GitHub", "NeurIPS". Also maybe "AIDaR workshop at NeurIPS". Also maybe "technical report AIDaRS". Also maybe "voluntary pilot". Also maybe "closed GitHub repositories". Also maybe "pull request". Also maybe "reviewer can leave general feedback or comment on a line". Also maybe "author receives via service". Also maybe "pilot will test whether GitHub review tools give more useful and reproducible feedback". Also maybe "organizers want to know whether uniformly structured project is easier for humans and software agents". Also maybe "participation voluntary, OpenReview remains mandatory submission route". We need to wrap key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates in double asterisks. So we can wrap 29 August maybe. Also maybe NeurIPS? That's a conference name, not a number but maybe considered important fact. The rule says "key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates". So conference name not required but could be considered important fact? It says "key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates". So we should limit to those. So we can wrap date 29 August. Also maybe OpenReview? It's a service name, not a number/percentage/drug/company/gene name/date. So maybe not. However we could wrap GitHub? It's a company name, qualifies as company name. So we can wrap GitHub in double asterisks. Also maybe AIDaRS? It's a project name, not a company/drug/gene. Not required. Could wrap NeurIPS? It's a conference, not a company/drug/gene. Not required. But we could still wrap if we want but limit to 4-5. Let's pick: 29 August, GitHub, OpenReview (maybe not needed), NeurIPS (maybe not needed). Let's stick to date and GitHub as two. Could also include "AIDaRS" as a project name but not required. Might be okay to wrap it but risk exceeding limit. Let's keep to 2-3. We also need to wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _. There's no explicit citation like a journal article; but there is "technical report AIDaRS". That's not a journal citation. There's no explicit study/journal citation. So we may not need any underscores. But we could wrap "technical report AIDaRS" maybe not needed. The rule says wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores. If none, we don't add. Thus we will have double asterisks around 29 August and GitHub maybe also OpenReview? It's a service name, not a company? It's a company/platform. Could be considered company name. But to be safe, we can wrap GitHub and OpenReview as company names. That's two. Plus date. That's three. Now format: Headline line, blank line, then paragraphs. We need to split into short paragraphs 2-3 sentences each.… 🔗 Read original →