Longevity InTime: Autonomous AI Institute. Anti-Aging Digital Health Immortality Transhumanist AI Channel

We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format: first line short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks. At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). Preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No commentary, no invented detail. No source link. We need to identify important facts: numbers: 31 August Axios published analysis; first three months of 2026 local resistance blocked or delayed 75 data-center projects worth $130 billion; August 15 head of Anthropic Dario Amodei linked trust in AI to real cancer treatment; Anthropic quickly scaling work in biology and medicine, hopes to see first signs of result in coming months; NVIDIA with Eli Lilly building lab for drug development; Isomorphic Labs applying AI to drug discovery; Lloyd Price, partner at Nelson Advisors digital health deals, criterion: "Most often I hear one question: where is the contribution or breakthrough that directly led to drug development? It's a team game, and AI is just one of its participants." Also citations: Brookings citing Data Center Watch; Axios article; maybe we need to wrap study/journal citations in single underscores. There's no explicit journal citation, but Brookings referencing Data Center Watch maybe considered a citation. Also "Axios published analysis" maybe not a citation. The instruction: "Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g. Nature Aging, July 2026)." So we need to wrap any such references. We have Brookings citing Data Center Watch – that's a citation. Also maybe "Axios" is a publication reference; we could wrap "Axios" in underscores? The instruction says study/journal citations and publication references. So we can wrap "Axios" as a publication reference. Also "Brookings" maybe a think tank, not a journal. But we can treat Brookings as a publication reference. However we need to be selective: at most 4-5 double asterisks for facts. Single underscores for citations can be more? Not limited but we should follow. We need to keep numbers and names in double asterisks: e.g., 31 August, first three months of 2026, 75, $130 billion, August 15, Anthropic, Dario Amodei, NVIDIA, Eli Lilly, Isomorphic Labs, Lloyd Price, Nelson Advisors. But we must limit to 4-5 double asterisks total. So we need to choose only the most important facts: maybe the numbers: 75, $130 billion, 31 August, first three months of 2026, August 15. That's 5. Or we could include company names as facts but they might be considered important. However the rule says "key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates". So company names also qualify. But we must limit to 4-5 total. So we need to decide which to highlight. Perhaps we highlight the numbers and dates, and leave company names without asterisks. Or we could highlight a couple company names and fewer numbers. Let's think: The most salient facts: the blockage of 75 projects worth $130bn in Q1 2026; the date of Axios article (31 Aug); Dario Amodei's statement on Aug 15 linking AI trust to cancer treatment. That's three numbers/dates. Could also include the company names Anthropic, NVIDIA/Eli Lilly, Isomorphic Labs as important but we might exceed limit. We can maybe include Anthropic as a company name, but then we have 4. Let's pick: 75, $130 billion, first three months of 2026, August 15. That's four. Or we could also include 31 August as date of article. But we already have August 15; maybe we need both… 🔗 Read original →