How should Rupert have handled the interview rather than dodging the question?
He tried to keep turning it back to the rape gang report, which was a good thing to do.
But in a debate the one asking the question is always the one in control.
Perhaps replying with this question would have had a better outcome?
"You keep insisting on the same question, as if you think the King's ethnicity is more important than the horrors revealed in the rape gang report". What sort of agenda is that?"