Messagehttps://medium.com/@danwadkin/the-grafted-branch-that-became-its-own-tree-why-islam-is-not-a-continuation-of-biblical-fa…

https://medium.com/@danwadkin/the-grafted-branch-that-became-its-own-tree-why-islam-is-not-a-continuation-of-biblical-faith-04b48f6e513c Islam claims to be a continuation and correction of Judaism and Christianity — a grafted branch on the tree of biblical revelation. But the theological fruit it produces contradicts the very roots it claims, and after Muhammad’s death, the graft gave way to an entirely new tree — with different roots, trunk, and fruit. What began as a narrative of continuity ended as a religion of replacement and rupture. What began as a borrowed narrative became a new religion with a new structure. Islam isn’t the completion of the biblical arc — it’s a rewriting of the entire script. 🔥 Conclusion: Islam Is Not a Graft — It’s a Substitution The metaphor of the grafted branch reveals Islam’s attempt to draw legitimacy from the biblical tradition. But the graft never took — and after Muhammad’s death, the branch grew in another direction entirely. ▫️It changed the character of God. ▫️It denied the cross. ▫️It invented new laws. ▫️It politicized prophecy. ▫️It erased redemptive history. Islam didn’t grow from biblical revelation. It hijacked its vocabulary, rejected its theology, and planted a new system in the soil of Arabian tribal politics and imperial ambition. https://t.me/+bJFOhkGTaUpiNTJh