Projects - Uniswap Foundation Security Fund

Thank you for the clarification. That makes sense from a compliance perspective, and we understand why the current UFSF process requires an established legal entity. At the same time, this is a little disappointing from a community perspective. One of the reasons Ethereum has lost some retail/community momentum to ecosystems like Solana is that smaller grassroots projects often struggle to access structured support unless they already look like traditional companies. SATO is exactly the kind of experiment that Ethereum used to make possible: immutable contracts, no operator, no treasury, no VC allocation, and a community trying to build documentation and security transparency around already-deployed code. We understand that SATO may not be eligible under the current requirements. But if the Foundation ever creates a separate path for immutable, operator-free, community-driven Uniswap v4 protocols, we would be very interested in participating and providing any public technical documentation needed for review. Thanks again for the transparency.