31 August 2026
Eze Miracletext not yet in the index
oh gosh, i try my best to do it on the weekend. But you know im more of a lurker on the weekend lol.
I got to touch some grass though this weekend. It rained so my nephews last flag football game got cancelled so i was sad for that, but soccer starts soon and I coach.
Guess what.. I have 8 girls and 4 boys on my team. Thats CRAZY. I hope I do a good job lol
havinstext not yet in the index
The cap filling fast won’t even be a surprise at this point, it’ll just be confirmation of what we already knew.
havinstext not yet in the index
the first cap shouldn’t linger. The constraint isn’t demand. It’s how small the opening window is.
Its like one toe getting dipped into the ocean to test to see if its warm enough. Rest assured, the waters fine ;)
Eze MiracleThe cap filling fast won’t even be a surprise at this point, it’ll just be confirmation of what we already knew.
The surprise would be if it didn’t fill. Idle BTC with self-custody and BTC-denominated yield was always going to test that cap quickly. The real data still starts after it rolls.
I feel like stacks core has been doing allot of BD so i highly doubt that it doesnt.
Im so excited lol
GPSC.BTCСсылка
I think the institutional participation is a strong signal, but the ~3% APY will ultimately decide how fast the cap fills.
If more institutions prioritize native BTC yield + self-custody over chasing higher-risk returns elsewhere, Genesis Bond could fill much faster than expected.
havinstext not yet in the index
Exactly.
The combination of native BTC yield and self-custody is the real differentiator.
If demand is coming from institutions that prioritize Bitcoin-native exposure, I can definitely see that initial cap filling quickly.
OAKSame here Havins.
@IdiongomfonAbasi @oak_crypt what happens first, $0.30 $STX or Genesis Bond. NFA
GPSC.BTCСсылка
I think the institutional participation itself is a strong signal.
For BTC holders, the appeal isn't just the ~3% APY, it's earning native BTC yield while keeping custody on L1 and avoiding lending or rehypothecation.
The first Bond will probably be a good test of whether that combination is compelling enough to drive real demand.
If the inaugural round fills quickly, that could say a lot more about the product than simply comparing APYs across different BTC yield options.
Kam ChalineI think the institutional participation itself is a strong signal.
For BTC holders, the appeal isn't just the ~3% APY, it's earning native BTC yield while keeping custody on L1 and avoiding lending or rehypothecation.
The first Bond will probably be a good test of whether that combination is comp
Agreed, comparing APYs misses the point entirely. Most BTC yield elsewhere requires giving up the thing that makes BTC valuable in the first place. A fast-filling first round tells you people are pricing in the no-rehypothecation part, not just chasing the number.
Kam ChalineI think the institutional participation itself is a strong signal.
For BTC holders, the appeal isn't just the ~3% APY, it's earning native BTC yield while keeping custody on L1 and avoiding lending or rehypothecation.
The first Bond will probably be a good test of whether that combination is comp
what you do this weekend?
IneeI’m good. Thank you!
What are you working on? I jus got done putting a video together about STX price action. I think things are looking very bullish!