9 August 2026
id 8708325709text not yet in the index
Please scroll up some messages and you'll find the latest info on this matter.
10 August 2026
id 8708325709I've read everything so far, it's not really an update.
Correct, but it's the latest info on the same question for now.
11 August 2026
Article 143
3. Crypto-asset service providers that provided their services in accordance with applicable law before 30 December 2024, may continue to do so until 1 July 2026 or until they are granted or refused an authorisation pursuant to Article 63, whichever is sooner.
Member States may decide not to apply the transitional regime for crypto-asset service providers provided for in the first subparagraph or to reduce its duration where they consider that their national regulatory framework applicable before 30 December 2024 is less strict than this Regulation.
By 30 June 2024, Member States shall notify to the Commission and ESMA whether they have exercised the option provided for in the second subparagraph and the duration of the transitional regime.
ChinnnArticle 143
3. Crypto-asset service providers that provided their services in accordance with applicable law before 30 December 2024, may continue to do so until 1 July 2026 or until they are granted or refused an authorisation pursuant to Article 63, whichever is sooner.
Member States may decide
all nash are offering is a self custody wallet right now so I think they are ok while we wait to get mica
12 August 2026
$Moneybags$all nash are offering is a self custody wallet right now so I think they are ok while we wait to get mica
Yes and no, I received this email today from Bitstamp which got me thinking maybe Nash's problem is exactly self hosting and regulated exchange in one.
"To comply with regulatory requirements, we are introducing automated deposit controls effective August 18, 2026.
What's changing:
Third-party deposits from unhosted wallets exceeding EUR 1,000 are not permitted. Any such deposit will be automatically rejected by our system — you will no longer need to manually reject third-party deposits yourself.
Deposits received from other exchanges are not affected by this change.
What you need to do:
Please note that third-party deposits from unhosted wallets exceeding EUR 1,000 are not permitted and will be automatically rejected by our system."
Which is the most ridiculous statement especially in crypto so you no longer can off ramp or even trade on a CEX unless it's purchased on their platform or someone else (for now) is doing kyc and aml for them.
13 August 2026
alex_dmdYes and no, I received this email today from Bitstamp which got me thinking maybe Nash's problem is exactly self hosting and regulated exchange in one.
"To comply with regulatory requirements, we are introducing automated deposit controls effective August 18, 2026.
What's changing:
Third-party dep
so you have to do 999 eur several times?
Diamond Like Carbon Like Carbonso you have to do 999 eur several times?
As with ordinary AML practice it won't be possible as it would be flagged as limit circumvention. Generally this predicament is so anti crypto it's beyond belief.
alex_dmdYes and no, I received this email today from Bitstamp which got me thinking maybe Nash's problem is exactly self hosting and regulated exchange in one.
"To comply with regulatory requirements, we are introducing automated deposit controls effective August 18, 2026.
What's changing:
Third-party dep
i remember reading it was a year or so ago, Nash wallets aren't unhosted wallets, they are KYC'd
$Moneybags$i remember reading it was a year or so ago, Nash wallets aren't unhosted wallets, they are KYC'd
Nash provides a non-custodial MPC wallet with which you can do crypto trading / DEX swapping without doing KYC, you just cannot use FIAT services without verification. Going with Bitstamp's (EU) logic you cannot even do basic crypto trading with funds coming from non-custodial wallets. Obviously one can speculate here different reasons for what that might mean in the future but my hope is whatever happens it won't affect Nash's core strength of combining a crypto-native approach with traditional finance.
alex_dmdNash provides a non-custodial MPC wallet with which you can do crypto trading / DEX swapping without doing KYC, you just cannot use FIAT services without verification. Going with Bitstamp's (EU) logic you cannot even do basic crypto trading with funds coming from non-custodial wallets. Obviously on
It was confirmed Nash hosts the wallets but they don’t hold the private keys.
alex_dmdExactly
your arguing "Third-party deposits from unhosted wallets exceeding EUR 1,000 are not permitted." then adding what your interpreting "Going with Bitstamp's (EU) logic you cannot even do basic crypto trading with funds coming from non-custodial wallets." the first statement is the correct one to address
Diamond Like Carbon Like CarbonBinance didn't get MICA license.
this is in Australia, travel rule as its called are world wide so this is what you should get aswell