Oasis Community

I understand that some information may genuinely be tied to the Privana launch and cannot be disclosed yet. But this is exactly where I think we are talking about two different things. The majority of my questions were not about Privana, and they were not asking for confidential information or future projections. I specifically asked about things that have already happened and should therefore have measurable results today. For Midas, for example, I asked what happened to the original $5M commitment, what was actually achieved on Sapphire, why there is currently no Midas TVL on Sapphire, and what Oasis expects from the new 2026 investment. For SemiLiquid, io.net, Carrot, Privana and the ROFL initiatives, I explicitly said that I was not asking for TVL as a universal metric. I was asking for the relevant measurable results and current status of each initiative. The response I received explained how Oasis’ strategy has evolved and why these partnerships may be viewed differently today. I understand that strategic shift. But it still didn’t answer the underlying questions about what was actually delivered by these investments and partnerships. That is why I don’t think it is accurate to frame the lack of answers simply as information becoming available with the Privana launch. Privana may provide new context for Oasis’ future strategy, but it cannot retrospectively answer what was achieved through previous investments, what the current status of those initiatives is, or what measurable results they produced. This is also why I keep bringing up the communication issue. I ask specific questions, they are passed to the team, and eventually I receive a broader explanation of the strategy rather than direct answers to the questions themselves. I appreciate that you continue to relay my concerns, but I think it’s important to distinguish between “the team hasn’t answered yet because the information isn’t public” and “the questions concern things that should already have measurable answers.” That distinction is exactly what I’m trying to understand.