Warden Protocol

Swapping WARD to HALO is like asking the BNB chain team to swap BNB into CAKE. That will not happen. These are ecosystem projects. As crypto projects they need tokens for multiple things; - Utility - Incentives - Visibility / Growth There are many more projects coming out. There’s been a massive work in the ecosystem to try and build and bring projects that complement, add value, and drive growth. But external devs might start to look into other ecosystems as the loudest voices are scaring them out. - Warden is agentic infrastructure. Warden 2.0 will need a lot of inference (compute from AI models). Why keep growing 3rd party compute projects when it can be kept within the ecosystem as well as make it grow and give holders and Warden community the opportunity to be part of it, - Halo is decentralised inference. Before Halo, Warden sourced from OpenAI, Venice and others. Now this is being made part of the Warden ecosystem. It’s actually super positive because the value that was driven into other companies is now driven into its own ecosystem. Plus let’s participants earn funds as anyone can be an operator. Both projects complement each other; they don’t compete. Why WARD or HALO. They are different, different projects different utilities. It’s not one will convert to the other. We want both to grow. In the same way that if any project comes to speak to Warden about launching their project in the Warden ecosystem we will give the same support, amplification, access to partners, listings etc. That is how growing ecosystems work. We cannot live in a small silo forever; we need growth and that comes with many projects. We hope to bring many more quality ones over the next months. The launch of Halo from Warden side has helped giving Warden a lot of visibility (very good one that will stay and make great things happen and unfortunately the bad one, fud that will pass soon as some haters woke up). So the summary is that Warden will be the most benefitted out of the launch of new projects.