Replymessage unavailable
Think it was pretty much well known fact by the judiciary, just not for the victims. We only figured it out when going through the process and because many cases hit the dockets at the same time and we were following it all that it feels like it’s only become evident in the past 2 years. K&E and W&C have their blueprint and each move was according to a well defined playbook that does not infringe upon the BK11 framework. Just a rinse and repeat for each case and adjusting parameters to match the specifics and then play the same moves again and again. Maybe a bit of a learning curve for crypto and no case law, but just reading the dockets you can see a well rehearsed tango.