Cellframe Node Support

will be figured out eventually

Hello! Could you please share the address of this node? 🙏🏻

@Tradernoob76 Hi, have you disabled the website? http://quantumbull.net/

Yes that is true. Early data was accurate but later data tended to shift towards uknkown. Probably only because of misunderstandings etc..

...but I have to say...for anyone trying to do the same in the future ; there are blocks that will jam the system, there are tens of thousands of same blocks...one after another. There will be mysteries, there will be head scrachers like never before...try to keep it in sync with POA zerochain....fuck it man. Just impossible. I tried for 4 years.

And I already quit once before...decided to give another shot and now decided to quit again. It just can not be done...not with my skills.

Do we have any info when we need to upgrade our nodes to 6.0

snarks ? or starks?

snarks provers rely on eliptic curve. suspectable to shors

also there is Chipmunk MRing signature thats ZK Ring treshold signature thats don't require SNARK/STARK or anything else. But thats for future usage, its too heavy for now. May be refactoring on NTT kernel helps it to optimize but now I've focused on quicker delivery. So current implementation I've called PQ SNARK but more correct to call it lattice-based STARK

Thanks anyways 😊

Maybe it was just the sync issue.