Maple

https://x.com/GibCryptoNews/status/2087930592444731708?s=20 PLEASE BE AWARE THERE ARE SCAMMERS EMAILING YOU PRETENDING TO BE FROM MAPLE FINANCE.

Regarding value accrual, I have already proposed here that borrowers could get better rates if they buy and lock a certain amount of SYRUP tokens for instance. Why not considering this seriously ?! In addition, I think you should truly study other mechanisms. For the buybacks, I see projects like HYPE, where the buybacks are much more important than Maple. In fact, there are 3 stakeholders here : borrowers, lenders and SYRUP holders. SYRUP holders are the least well-treated, and imo, at the moment, the project could work more or less without the token. Also, there is an important 4th stakeholder : YOU and your co-founders. We do not really know if you own sufficient tokens to be interested to the token value accrual. It is the question of alignment between the team and token holders. This a real question for me also …

Maple's becoming the credit engine inside other people's distribution." @syrupsid on Robinhood, Kraken, and syrupUSDG in this month's community AMA, alongside July's numbers and the questions the community sent in. Full call below⬇️ https://x.com/maplefinance/status/2087949641224753355?s=46&t=kHbJy_8FG_nVQmMWa9YghA

https://x.com/i/status/2087925758950023277 Higher Maple revenue means higher $SYRUP buyback.

You got the 4th stakeholder all wrong, their tokens are just tokens I dont know what the opex burn rate is but 90% of last months revenue goes towards opex including salaries

"Maple's becoming the credit engine inside other people's distribution." @syrupsid on Robinhood, Kraken, and syrupUSDG in this month's community AMA, alongside July's numbers and the questions the community sent in. Full call: https://x.com/maplefinance/status/2087592778540949522

Buybacks scale programmatically with revenue, so as protocol revenue grows, a larger percentage is allocated to buybacks. At the same time, it’s important to maintain treasury reserves so the protocol remains resilient across different market conditions and doesn’t have to sell tokens later to fund operations.

We are live again this weekend! https://x.com/GibCryptoNews/status/2087967764963082326?s=20

So of the 90% of non-buyback revenue 100% of that was spent?

Not necessarily. The remaining revenue isn’t assumed to be fully spent. It supports the protocol’s operating costs and treasury reserves, helping ensure Maple remains resilient across different market conditions. The buyback percentage is designed to balance value accrual with long-term sustainability.

So are Maple reserves and SSF reserves separate reserves then?

Yes they're separate. SSF is set aside for strategic opportunities, token liquidity, and buybacks. Regular Maple Treasury is for operating expenses and capex

https://x.com/i/status/2087951859285966996 gmaple