John DI wonder where your evidence for this claim is. A willful misunderstanding or are you concerned about the channel getting flagged for "Fed posting"?
No, I meant he did that himself not the whole channel.
Just TheDoctorMainly because you hopped on right as the fed was literally calling for violence instead of voting. Hard to tell you guys apart.
I see you're unfamiliar with the extrapolation of what "voting" means.
Just TheDoctorMainly because you hopped on right as the fed was literally calling for violence instead of voting. Hard to tell you guys apart.
Where did I "advocate for violence" exactly? Please provide a quote.
J A series of questions comes to mind when this is your focus: Why do you think you can't vote as a national? What law is being broken? Is there any example to examine? Why do you think the vote matters? Does it matter who counts the votes in private? Does it matter who you're allowed to vote for? Why is this method of voting more valuable than a withdrawal of refeeding resources to the State and Federal Reserve? Any of these questions may be worthy of inquiry in good faith.P J I noted that someone else seemed interested in a discussion about taxes. This kind of engagement is rather perplexing, if I was to assume good faith. I am inclined to believe that this is someone who believes so much in the State that he can't consider operating outside of it, if voting is in his mind more important than feeding resources back to the State. (Assuming taxes are even used that way.)J