Replymessage unavailable
He was an excellent candidate on paper. The issue is that Nash doesn't decide whether the CEO is suitable the AFM does. If Nash formally appointed him before completing an informal pre-screening with the regulator, and the AFM then raised specific objections about his person, the exit becomes immediate and non-negotiable. If the problem were related to obtaining the MiCA license itself, they wouldn't have reopened the job posting so quickly.