Replymessage unavailable
Yes I think we can completely discount the case against that bloke alleged to have conducted an assassination. He posed in photos that contained obvious symbology. Who knows what is really going on but a bit like 9/11 we may not know what did happen exactly but we know that what they are saying as the official story is total nonsense. The claim that he was offed to stop talking about Israel and the jews behaviour doesn't really stand up to me. Seems way too convenient with some handy video clips. Who cares what he says when there are plenty of others talking in the same way. I don't see Charlie Kirks opinions if they were independent and genuine as being so important that he had to be offed. On the other hand if he was a central casting operative that they wanted to retire this is the only way that can really be done otherwise he would have to live the rest of his life in this character. All goes back to the central point of was that a credible event. If he participated in any way, such as closing his eyes and tensing just before the supposed shot then he was involved in a performance. If he did then he had to have a credible reason for participating that made sense to him. I suppose he could have been duped to participate and offed later but once the performance had been executed theres no real need. He has been removed from the public stage and cannot return. Listen to all the points Eric Coppolino went through which I won't even attempt to summarise here.