Oasis Community

🌎Oasis Telegram Channels🌏 🏳️ Arabic - عربي (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Arabic) 🇧🇩 বাংলা (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Bangladesh) 🇧🇾 Belarus (https://t.me/Oasis_Belarus) 🇧🇷 Português (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Brazil) 🇵🇹 🇨🇳 中国官方 (https://t.me/oasisnetworkchina) 🇫🇷 Français (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_France) 🇩🇪 Deutsch (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Germany) 🇮🇹 Italia (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Italy) 🇮🇳 भारत (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_India) 🇮🇩 bahasa Indonesia (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Indonesia) 🇯🇵 日本語 (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_japan8) 🇰🇷 한국인 (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Korea) 🇲🇾 Malaysia (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunityMalaysia) 🇳🇬 Nigeria (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Nigeria) 🇵🇭 Pilipinas (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Philippine) 🇷🇺 Россия (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Russia) 🇷🇸 Србија (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Serbia) 🇸🇬 Singapura (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Singapore8) 🇮🇷 فارسی (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Persia) 🇪🇸 Español (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Spanish) 🇲🇽🇨🇱🇨🇴🇪🇨🇵🇪🇵🇾🇺🇾🇻🇪🇬🇹 🇱🇰 ශ්‍රී ලංකා (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_SriLanka) 🇸🇪 Svenska (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Sweden8) 🇨🇭 Schweiz (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunitySwitzerland) 🇹🇭 Thailand (https://t.me/Oasisthailand) 🇹🇷 Türkiye (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Turkey) 🇺🇦 Україна (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Ukraine) 🇺🇿 O'zbekiston (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Uzbekistan) 🇻🇳 Việt Nam (https://t.me/OasisNetworkCommunity_Vietnam)

The argument “I’m sure things will be different as soon as the product will be out and everyone will be eager to test it” is simply not true and does not address the problems the community is pointing out to you. Users don’t come out of nowhere, or does the Oasis marketing team think otherwise? If you want people to test a product, especially at an early stage, they need a reason to do it. That can be incentives, marketing, community engagement, ideally all of them! Right now, none of this exists, and your denial of these problems concerns and disappoints me. Expecting users to suddenly appear immediately after launch and become eager to test the product at scale does not look like a realistic strategy. I completely understand and support the participant’s disappointment. A product launch is not a magic button that automatically creates a user base. You need to build interest in advance, attract early users, and give them a reason to participate both before and around the launch. Otherwise, the team risks releasing a product into an audience that effectively doesn’t exist yet. Does anyone disagree with me?

Hello, Thank you for sharing your thoughts. The point about pre-launch audience building and go-to-market is one I'll make sure gets passed along to the team. 🌹

I’ve noticed a systematic problem with how communication with the Oasis community is handled. When the community raises difficult or uncomfortable questions, the response is very often something like “I’ll pass this along to the team.” But afterwards, in most cases, we never receive any response from the actual team. And when a response does appear, it often doesn’t actually address the questions that were raised. We saw exactly the same situation a few days ago when questions were raised about Midas and the investment in this project. I also asked a specific list of questions, but so far I still haven’t received a clear and substantive response from the team. I understand that ambassadors cannot answer every question themselves, and I have nothing against them passing feedback to the team. The problem is what happens afterwards: where are the actual answers from the people who are directly responsible for the project? At some point, repeatedly saying “we’ll pass this along to the team” without any follow-up response stops being meaningful communication. This approach creates the impression that the community has been heard, while in practice the questions simply remain unanswered. A serious project should be able to communicate directly with its community, especially when it comes to important decisions, investments, product development, and the future of the project. I genuinely want to see the actual team address these questions directly, instead of ambassadors constantly having to act as intermediaries between the community and the team.

I hear you, and I understand the frustration. I want to be straight with you though: the team has responded to a number of questions, but some things genuinely can't be made public yet. That's not the same as questions being ignored, it's that the concrete answers to a lot of what you're asking are tied to the Privana launch, and more information will become available as we get closer to it. We've shared as much as we're able to at this stage, and I'll continue to relay the points you've raised.

The tension is real. A successful release can’t come soon enough.

I understand that some information may genuinely be tied to the Privana launch and cannot be disclosed yet. But this is exactly where I think we are talking about two different things. The majority of my questions were not about Privana, and they were not asking for confidential information or future projections. I specifically asked about things that have already happened and should therefore have measurable results today. For Midas, for example, I asked what happened to the original $5M commitment, what was actually achieved on Sapphire, why there is currently no Midas TVL on Sapphire, and what Oasis expects from the new 2026 investment. For SemiLiquid, io.net, Carrot, Privana and the ROFL initiatives, I explicitly said that I was not asking for TVL as a universal metric. I was asking for the relevant measurable results and current status of each initiative. The response I received explained how Oasis’ strategy has evolved and why these partnerships may be viewed differently today. I understand that strategic shift. But it still didn’t answer the underlying questions about what was actually delivered by these investments and partnerships. That is why I don’t think it is accurate to frame the lack of answers simply as information becoming available with the Privana launch. Privana may provide new context for Oasis’ future strategy, but it cannot retrospectively answer what was achieved through previous investments, what the current status of those initiatives is, or what measurable results they produced. This is also why I keep bringing up the communication issue. I ask specific questions, they are passed to the team, and eventually I receive a broader explanation of the strategy rather than direct answers to the questions themselves. I appreciate that you continue to relay my concerns, but I think it’s important to distinguish between “the team hasn’t answered yet because the information isn’t public” and “the questions concern things that should already

We were discussing Privana, which is why I answered about information becoming available as we near the launch. Regarding your other questions, those were already addressed by the team, and I understand the response wasn't what you were hoping for. I've also passed on your suggestion for a public write-up.

Oasians, we need your help! We’re collecting feedback on: 🔹 Rose App & Oasis Explorer 🔹 Mods & Support experience on Discord/Telegram 🔹 What you want better – product, docs, dev support & more! Just fill out the form below, only takes a couple of minutes CommuniTEE Feeeeedback :D

🌹 Chat Rules 🌹 🌐 English only — use regional channels for other languages 💸 No price talk — token discussion belongs elsewhere 🤝 Be respectful — no discrimination, hate, or offensive content 🎯 Stay on-topic — keep discussions about Oasis only (no shilling) 🚫 No abuse or trolling — permanent bans apply 🔞 No NSFW/NSFL content 📵 No spam, FUD, pumping, or OTC trading ❓ When unsure, ask a mod ⚠️ Security Notice Admins never DM first, ask for funds/private keys, or make special offers. 🛎 Report suspicious messages with !report

Taking my leave for now, my fellow Oasians. Keep enjoying the fantastic weekend. See you all later tomorrow — bye-bye!

There is an inherent trust problem in AI – it is called data sovereignty. There are policies in place that promise privacy, but practically no guardrails. It is “trust me, bro” all over again. But what we need is “trust but verify”. Solution: confidential computation in secure enclaves, verifiable, tamper-proof, and with reproducible attestation. https://x.com/OasisProtocol/status/2082707772064551033

I'm looking for friends to have serious conversations with; people who just want to have fun, stay away from me.

yes. I do. You demand answers because you have a comparatively small amount of capital investment into Oasis Rose. The company has major acquisitions intended and you want immediate aura sauce to feel comfortable about your risk. Acknowledgement of your questions does not help with future project goals as secrecy in markets is sometimes key to better deals for company direction. This is simple to see and you should know that you take risk you buy a ticket to take a ride and if it is scary then good. You chose to take the ride. When you see the ride is done and you say that sucked or that was fun and you got benefit from it then in hindsight you look back and say my what an atrocious and spoiled troll I was saying or asking all those unnecessary things that were really not any of my business because of corporate secrets and timing to Achieve all of those things for investors. Keep calm and carry on. If you don't see the writing on the wall from everything that has already been released you are not paying attention or you don't have the aptitude for what it is you are looking at. Pay someone or ask other smart people to explain it to you and stop bothering these people that obviously are put here to babysit people and just be patient. I apologize for some of the rude comments but some people don't understand anything except sharp rebuke.