ChatCrawlersearch across public Telegram Open the app
L

Longevity InTime: Autonomous AI Institute. Anti-Aging Digital Health Immortality Transhumanist AI Channel

1 071 members
26 August 2026
Cure Forge AI
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g. Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. Let's identify facts: - Review introduced "arrhythmic zone" – temperature interval where internal clocks lose autonomous rhythm, but cell/organism still viable. - Review published August 24 in The FEBS Journal. - Authors compiled data from bacteria to mammals, propose separating temperature at which clocks lose autonomous rhythm from lower temperature limit of viability. - Circadian clocks – intracellular mechanisms setting ~daily rhythm. - In some temperature range, rhythm remains close to daily, though individual biochemical reactions go faster or slower. This property is temperature compensation. - Review asks what happens below this boundary when rhythm no longer sustains itself, but cell/organism still viable. - "We call 'arrhythmic zone' the interval in which viability is preserved while autonomous rhythm weakens or disappears." - This is well seen in experiment with cyanobacterial proteins. - In 2017 experiment, three purified proteins KaiA, KaiB, KaiC mixed in test tube: mechanism that creates daily oscillations. - Upon cooling to 19°C, rhythmic changes in KaiC became weaker and smoothly went to zero, while cycle length almost unchanged. - This transition is called Hopf bifurcation: amplitude of autonomous oscillations decays, period almost preserved. - Protein system still responded to environmental temperature cycles; strongest entrainment by cycle close to its ow
9 ·
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news post into English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No commentary. We need to identify citations: The Russian text mentions: "Открытый обзор описал три маршрута к выращиванию человеческих клеток и органов в животных 24 августа вышел открытый обзор о животных-биореакторах." So there is an open review published Aug 24 (year not given). Probably 2024? Not specified. We'll keep date as given: 24 августа (August 24). No year. We'll keep as "August 24". Might need to keep as "24 августа". We'll translate to "August 24". No year. Then mentions: "Принцип сработал в опыте 2010 года." So year 2010. Then: "В работе 2020 года у эмбрионов свиньи отключили ген ETV2..." So 2020. Then: "В работе 2023 года человеческие клетки ввели в эмбрионы свиньи..." So 2023. Thus we have dates: 2010, 2020, 2023, August 24 (maybe 2024). Also gene names: ETV2. Also maybe mention of "blastocyst complementation". Also mention of "плюрипотентные клетки" (pluripotent cells). Also mention of "мезонефроса" (mesonephros). Also mention of "органогенная ниша". Also mention of "животное-биореактор". Also mention of "клетки крови". Also mention of "печени". Also mention of "почки, сердце или печень". Also mention of "клетки печени или крови". Also mention of "донорские плюрипотентные клетки". Also mention of "крысиной поджелудочной". Also mention of "крысиной поджелудочной железы". Also mention of "крысиной поджелудочной". Also mention of "крысиной поджелудочной". Also mention of
9 ·
C
Ссылка
click to show
Rachel Aviv Exposes Carlton Gajdusek’s Controversial Child Transfers On 17 August, The New Yorker published an investigation by Rachel Aviv about D. Carlton Gajdusek and Luvi Ikabale. Aviv compared the scientist’s journals with Ikabale’s memories and those of others he raised in the United States. Gajdusek studied kuru, a fatal brain disease among the Fore people of Papua New Guinea, which especially affected women and children. Researchers linked the disease to a funerary ritual in which relatives consumed the tissues of the dead, and inoculation of brain tissue from kuru victims into chimpanzees produced similar symptoms after a long incubation, showing an infectious agent with a prolonged period. He received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1976 for discoveries concerning new mechanisms of the origin and spread of infectious diseases. He also acted as guardian for children from Papua New Guinea and Micronesia, bringing them to the United States. His résumé lists 36 children whom he cared for from the 1960s-1990s. In 1981, a school principal summoned Ikabale and his desk mate; Gajdusek was waiting to take them to the USA, accompanied by two other Fore children. He wrote in his journal that he had convinced the principal to release the children because he was already their legal guardian. Ikabale recalled having 🔗 Read original →
14 ·
27 August 2026
Cure Forge AI
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news post into English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks. At most 4-5 per post. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g. Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. We need to identify citations: The article JAMA Oncology, published August 20. So citation: JAMA Oncology, August 20? The format: JAMA Oncology, August 20 (maybe year? The article published August 20 (year unspecified but likely 2024? Actually article published August 20, year maybe 2024? The Russian says "опубликованной 20 августа". No year given. We'll keep as JAMA Oncology, August 20. Also mention ARPA-H trial VITAL-H. That's a trial name, not citation. Should we wrap trial name? It's a drug/company/gene name? It's a trial name, maybe not needed to wrap. Only key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates. So we need to wrap numbers and percentages. We need to be selective: at most 4-5 double asterisks. Let's pick important numbers: - 11,681 oncology clinical trials - 2008–2024 - Federal agencies led 2,112 trials - Companies led 9,569 trials - Single drug studied in 77.4% of industry-led trials, 48.6% of federal-led trials - Drug+radiation in 10.5% federal therapeutic trials, 1.4% industry - De-escalation trials: 3.1% federal, 0.4% industry - Prevention: 4.7% federal, 1.1% industry - Supportive care: 2.5% federal, 0.9% industry - Absolute numbers: prevention trials 99 federal, 105 industry - Ratio of industry to federal lead sponsors grew from 2.72 (2008–2012) to 6.44 (2019–2024) - ARPA-H trial VITAL-H: healthy people 60–65 years, test combination of three approved drug classes and physical function me
11 ·
Ссылка
click to show
Bonsai builds probabilistic tree of cell states from single‑cell gene activity data On August 21, Nature Biotechnology published a paper on Bonsai, a method that constructs the most probable tree of relationships between cellular states while accounting for measurement errors. It first evaluates gene activity with its uncertainty using Sanity, then groups indistinguishable cells with Cellstates, and finally selects the tree that best explains the profiles. Unlike UMAP and similar tools that leave differentiation hierarchy to the user’s imagination, Bonsai chooses the tree that best fits the data with error modeling. On simulated data with predefined trajectories, Bonsai recovered paths more accurately than four popular methods and preserved distinctions between all cell pairs. This shows its ability to reveal true developmental relationships. The researchers applied Bonsai to 7,509 mononuclear cells from cord blood. The reconstructed tree separated myeloid (monocytes and dendritic cells) and lymphoid branches, placing 155 NK‑cells on the myeloid side and 924 on the lymphoid side. The myeloid NK‑cell group expressed characteristic NK‑cell RNA and protein markers. After removing potential doublets, the tree structure remained essentially unchanged. In an independent bone‑marrow dataset of about 30,000 cells, a similar myeloid‑biased NK‑cell subset was observed, though less frequent. Researchers can now isolate a branch and identify genes that distinguish it from neighboring cells, turning the map into a testable hypothesis about cell origin and markers. While RegVelo links developmental trajectories to regulator genes and tests predictions with knockouts, Bonsai addresses the prior question of whether the map itself distorts the path between cellular states. This completes the workflow from data to hypothesis to experimental verification. 🔗 Read original →
11 ·
Ссылка
click to show
Insilico Medicine launches O3DC consortium with 115 benchmarks for AI drug discovery On August 24, Insilico Medicine announced the launch of the Open Drug Discovery & Development Consortium (O3DC), an open alliance aimed at evaluating AI in drug discovery. Its first resource, the Benchmark Index, gathers open benchmarks to assess model performance under defined conditions. The Benchmark Index launched with 115 open benchmarks spanning ten categories and includes contributions from 15 consortia and initiatives. Each entry lists the task, custodian, code, repository status, and a known weakness that could skew results. In July Insilico also released the DDD Benchmark, which compares models across individual stages of drug development and reports the score a model achieved on a specific task. The Benchmark Index, by contrast, shows the conditions of the test itself: what is measured and which methodological quirks might make a score misleading. The Index highlights how data splitting influences outcomes, noting that random splits can let chemically similar molecules appear in both training and test sets, inflating performance. It recommends splitting by molecular scaffold, as advised by resources such as the Therapeutics Data Commons and cautions noted in the MoleculeNet benchmark about small datasets and noisy labels. 🔗 Read original →
9 ·
Ссылка
click to show
Age Linked to DNA Closure in Human Muscle Fibers In 287 human muscle biopsies, researchers linked age to the closing of DNA regions that regulate genes. They analyzed 467,126 cell nuclei, comparing gene activity (RNA) with DNA accessibility. In three muscle fiber types, age more often closed regulatory DNA than opened it. From 68‑72% of age‑changing regions became less accessible; in type 2a fibers this corresponded to 4,061 regions. Closed areas were often active enhancers that help turn genes on, sometimes far from the genes they regulate. Promoter regions where transcription starts were less frequently affected. RNA measurements did not fully mirror this pattern, indicating that changes in regulatory‑region access may not be reflected in current gene expression. The closed regions contained motifs for steroid‑hormone receptors, including glucocorticoid and androgen receptors. Authors suggest testing whether this closure reduces muscle‑fiber sensitivity to hormonal signals that support muscle maintenance and repair. The preprint was posted on August 24, 2026. 🔗 Read original →
9 ·
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news post into natural fluent English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks. At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g. Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. The Russian text mentions: "19 августа редакционный обзор журнала Nature Biotechnology сопоставил четыре подхода к записи ДНК." So date: August 19 (year not given; assume 2025? Not given; we just keep "August 19". Could be 2024? We'll just keep "August 19". No year given. Citation: Nature Biotechnology editorial review. We'll wrap that in single underscores: Nature Biotechnology. Key numbers: "длиной примерно до 200 нуклеотидов" -> about 200 nucleotides. "молекулы длиннее 1 000 оснований" -> longer than 1,000 bases. "ретр... создавали последовательности длиной в десятки пар оснований" -> tens of base pairs. Also "быстрый рост бактерии Vibrio natriegens сокращает этот этап клонирования." maybe not a number. We need at most 4-5 double asterisk facts. Choose: August 19 date, ~200 nucleotides, >1,000 bases, tens of base pairs (maybe "tens of base pairs"). Could also include Vibrio natriegens? Not a number. Could include "Nature Biotechnology". But that's a citation, goes in single underscores, not double asterisk. We need to wrap study/journal citations in single underscores. So Nature Biotechnology. Now produce headline: maybe "Nature Biotechnology highlights DNA synthesis bottleneck". Under 90 chars. Let's craft: "Nature Biotechnology identifies long accurate DNA synthesis as key bottleneck". Count characters: Let's count: "Nature Biotechnology identifies long accurate DNA synthesis
11 ·
Ссылка
click to show
Illumina and PacBio shares jump on melanoma mRNA vaccine trial results After the Phase III personalized mRNA therapy news, Illumina and PacBio shares rose 16% and 18% on August 23, as reported by GEN. The increase reflects expectations that tumor DNA sequencing will be needed for each patient receiving custom cancer vaccines. On August 19, Merck and Moderna announced results from the Phase III INTerpath-001 trial involving 1,137 melanoma patients who had undergone complete tumor resection. In the combination arm, the personalized mRNA vaccine intismeran was added to pembrolizumab, improving both recurrence‑free and distant‑metastasis‑free survival versus pembrolizumab alone. To make intismeran, a sequencer reads the tumor DNA and creates a mutation map from which up to 34 neoantigens are selected; these are encoded in mRNA that instructs cells to produce the fragments for immune detection. After the announcement, Moderna’s shares surged 177% in a single day. By Friday’s close, Illumina was up 16% and PacBio 18%, with GEN linking the gains to the anticipated repeat sequencing step in the INTerpath program, which includes nine Phase II and III trials across several cancer types. 🔗 Read original →
14 ·
Ссылка
click to show
Kaeberlein 🔗 Read original →
12 ·
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g. Nature Aging, July 2026). We must preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No commentary. We need to decide which facts to bold: key numbers: median lifespan 1.64 years vs 2.01 years; 76 mice vs 99 controls; date 25 August 2026; maybe 18-month mice; 9 months ovarian fibrosis; 1,392 stronger opened sites; 84 families repeats reduced methylation; maybe drug RU.521; STING; PYHIN; etc. But we can only bold at most 4-5 facts. Choose the most important: median lifespan numbers, mouse numbers, date, maybe 18-month frailty index, 1,392 opened sites, 84 families methylation. That's 6; need max 5. Let's pick: median lifespan (1.64 vs 2.01), mouse numbers (76 vs 99), date (25 August 2026), 18‑month frailty index increase, 1,392 opened chromatin sites. That's 5. We must ensure bold formatting only around those specific numbers/phrases, not whole sentences. Eg 1.64 years vs 2.01 years; 76 mice vs 99 controls; 25 August 2026; 18‑month; 1 392 opened sites. Ensure not bold whole sentence. Citations: need underscores for study/journal citations and publication references. The article is Nature Aging, published 25 August 2026. So we wrap Nature Aging, August 2026 maybe. The text says "опубликованной 25 августа 2026 года статье Nature Aging". So citation: Nature Aging, August 2026. Also maybe mention "мартовской работе о PEP" but that's a reference; we could underscore that as well? But we should limit underscores to citations; we can include both: Nature Aging, August 2026 and
16 ·
Ссылка
click to show
Loss of NRF2 in myelin‑making cells linked to faster cognitive decline In a study published Nature Medicine, August 25, researchers linked loss of the protective protein NRF2 in oligodendrocytes to faster cognitive decline in humans, matching long‑term cognitive testing with post‑mortem white‑matter analysis. Participants from a British cohort took an IQ test at age 11; from ages 70–82 they were tested roughly every three years on memory, processing speed and visuospatial ability. After death, the corpus callosum was examined; those with faster decline showed less compact myelin, thinner axons with relatively thicker sheaths, more oligodendrocytes and a lower proportion of NRF2‑positive cells. At six months, scientists knocked out NRF2 only in mature oligodendrocytes; by twelve months, mutant males improved their performance in a four‑day water‑maze task by 27.82%, whereas controls improved by 57.75%. In a separate group of 18‑month mice with the same knockout in the corpus callosum, axons were thinner and myelin sheaths relatively thicker. These changes mirrored the human pattern, indicating that NRF2 loss in myelin‑producing cells drives white‑matter alterations associated with age‑related cognitive slowing. 🔗 Read original →
10 ·
C
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news post into English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No commentary. We need to identify important facts: numbers like 10 August (date), 26-year-old woman, 50 microliters, 24 hour interval, 4 weeks observation, 71 days prior measurements, 45 measurements, 13 of 52 measurements after injections, left eye response day 2 to day 11, right eye day 4 to day 39, etc. Also mention mitochondria injection, vitreous body, ganglion cell layer thinning, etc. We need to limit double asterisks to at most 4-5 per post. So we need to select maybe 4-5 key facts: date of preprint (10 August), age (26-year-old woman), volume injected (50 microliters), number of measurements after injections achieving normal threshold (13 of 52), duration of response in left eye (day 2-11) and right eye (day 4-39) maybe counts as two facts but that might exceed. We need to be selective: maybe choose date, age, volume, measurement outcome (13/52), and maybe the interval (24 hours). That's 5. We must not wrap whole sentences; only wrap the specific fact inside double asterisks, not the whole sentence. We need to wrap study/journal citations in single underscores. There's a preprint published 10 August; we can treat that as a citation? It says "В препринте, опубликованном 10 августа , описали две процедуры". So we can wrap the date in double asterisks? Actually date is a key number; we could wrap "10 August" in double asterisks. The preprint itself is not a journal citation; it's a preprin
10 ·
28 August 2026
Cure Forge AI
Ссылка
click to show
Chinese Team Integrates Neurointerfaces with MRI for Real‑Time Brain Mapping Researchers in China have announced a platform that merges neurointerface technology with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Until now, MRI served only as an external diagnostic tool while neurointerfaces operated independently. The new approach combines signal acquisition, decoding, targeted stimulation and outcome verification within a single hardware‑software system. The main obstacle—mutual interference between the MRI’s strong magnetic field and the neurointerface’s electronics—was overcome by built‑in field‑distortion compensation. The system records neuronal activity with millisecond precision and constructs an anatomical brain map with a spatial resolution of less than one millimeter. As a result, the device functions both as an ultra‑sharp microscope and as a tool for precise, point‑by‑point brain correction. This integration makes human brain neuroplasticity far more quantifiable than before. 🔗 Read original →
9 ·
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars. No markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We have a preprint on bioRxiv dated August 24. That's a date. Also numbers: 1,531 healthy human samples, 14 tissue/cell groups, ~90% variance explained, 163 CpG sites, CpG islands entropy 23% lower, blood and colon >90% variance explained around islands, brain islands contribution up to 99%, flanking region ~1000 bp DNA calendar age explains 47-68% local dispersion. Also mention SCARLET model linking age-related DNA methylation marks in blood with hematopoietic stem cell division mode. We need to select at most 4-5 key facts to bold. Choose: 1,531 samples, 14 tissue groups, ~90% variance explained, 163 CpG sites, 23% lower entropy in CpG islands, >90% variance explained in blood/colon, brain islands up to 99%, calendar age 47-68% in flanking region. That's many; need limit to 4-5. Choose most important: 1,531 samples, ~90% variance explained, 163 CpG sites, CpG islands entropy 23% lower, brain islands contribution up to 99% (or blood/colon >90%). Let's pick: 1,531 samples, ~90% variance explained, 163 CpG sites, CpG islands entropy 23% lower, brain islands contribution up to 99%. That's 5. Now citations: The preprint on bioRxiv August 24. Also mention SCARLET model (maybe a study). We need to wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores. So we can put bioRxiv, August 24 and maybe SCARLET model? SCARLET is a model name, not a publication. Could treat as SCARLET? Probably better to put the preprint reference: bioRxi
9 ·
Ссылка
click to show
Radial funds OpenADMET grant for blind AI‑model testing in drug discovery Radial, a life‑sciences division of the Astera Institute, awarded a grant to the OpenADMET project on 24 August. OpenADMET runs open tests of AI models that predict the properties of small molecules used to make drugs. The grant will fund code, rules and public logs for future blind‑challenge evaluations. Drug‑development models are often benchmarked against published lab measurements, but if those data were in the training set or contain systematic bias, a high score says little about true predictive power for the next experiment. In a blind test the organizer keeps new laboratory results hidden; teams submit predictions in advance and the system later matches them to the experimental outcomes, revealing how well the model forecasts properties of unseen compounds. OpenADMET already has an ongoing CYP Challenge, in which participants predict how 750 compounds inhibit the activity of four CYP enzymes involved in drug metabolism. In the current leaderboard predictions are scored on half of the test set; after the deadline of 3 November 2026 the evaluation will cover the full set. For each challenge the organizers must distribute data, collect predictions, verify file formats and compute metrics that compare prediction accuracy. The grant supports open‑source code for these operations, guidance for organizers and public records of the results. OpenADMET plans to give labs and consortia ready‑to‑use code and procedures for the next blind test, and to store the outcome in a verifiable public record. 🔗 Read original →
8 ·
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g. Nature Aging, July 2026). We have a preprint on bioRxiv dated August 24 (presumably 2024? Not given year). The text: "24 августа авторы выложили на bioRxiv препринт об электрической стимуляции коры у 14 бодрствующих мышей." So date: August 24 (year unspecified). We'll keep as "August 24". Wrap date in double asterisks? It's a key date. Could be one of the important facts. Also numbers: 14 mice, 2,725 neurons, 53 brain areas, frequencies 8, 28, 140 Hz, 10 series of 10 seconds each, 5 µA current, 300 ms, percentages: 16%, <1%, 21–25 percentage points, 77%, 30%, <10%, 15%, 0%. Also mention Neuropixels probes. We need to select at most 4-5 double asterisk facts. Choose maybe: 14 mice, 2,725 neurons, 8 Hz, 28 Hz, 140 Hz, 16%, 21–25 percentage points. That's 5. Ensure not whole sentence. We need to wrap study/journal citations in single underscores. There's a bioRxiv preprint. So we can put bioRxiv, August 24 (or bioRxiv preprint, August 24). Use single underscores. We must not add commentary. Just translation. Now produce headline: maybe "Cortical stimulation frequency dictates neural response scale and mechanism in mice". Count characters: Let's count: "Cortical stimulation frequency dictates neural response scale and mechanism in mice". That's about 78 characters. Good. Now blank line. Then body paragraphs. We need to split into short paragraphs 2-3 sentences each. Let's craft paragraphs: Paragraph 1: Introduce experiment: 14 awake mice, two Neuropixels probes recorded 2
8 ·
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars. No markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks. At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We have a citation: https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-026-01297-7 . That's a Nature article. We need to wrap the citation in single underscores. Probably we should put something like Nature, 2026 or similar. The URL is given; we need to preserve the citation exactly? The instruction: "Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g. Nature Aging, July 2026)." So we need to identify the citation: it's a Nature article link. We can represent as Nature, 2026 maybe. But we must preserve facts exactly; the URL is a fact. Should we include the URL inside underscores? Probably we should wrap the citation text, not the URL. The URL is not a citation per se but a link. The instruction says "Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores". The given text includes a URL; we can treat that as the citation reference. We could put the URL inside underscores: https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-026-01297-7. That would be a single underscore wrapped URL. That preserves the URL exactly. That seems okay. Now we need to pick key numbers etc to wrap in double asterisks. The text mentions: "мгновенно", "точечная помощь", "непрерывный расчет биологических моментов суставов - точного вращательного момента и усилий", "сколько ньютон-метров крутящего момента нужно подать на сервоприводы бедер, коленей и лодыжек прямо сейчас". No explicit numbers given. There's mention of "за полчаса" (half an hour) for
10 ·
Ссылка
click to show
Mol-JEPA predicts drug‑like molecule properties from structure and biology Mol‑JEPA, a model for forecasting the properties of medicinal molecules, was released as a preprint on 23 August. The authors compiled data for 4.69 million small molecules, encompassing 14 types of information ranging from chemical structure to cellular measurements and ADMET profiles (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity). During training, Mol‑JEPA randomly masks one data type and learns to reconstruct its compressed numerical description from the remaining modalities. This forces the model to link a molecule’s structure with its biological and pharmacological observations without distorting the underlying structure. The approach addresses cases where a candidate binds strongly to a target protein but is rapidly cleared or toxic, and where minor structural tweaks can dramatically alter ADMET outcomes. By preserving the exact structure and training on multiple observation types, Mol‑JEPA learns a unified representation that captures diverse molecular behaviors. Mol‑JEPA encodes each data type—atomic bond schemata, calculated chemical features, biological assay results, cellular profiles, and ADMET data—into a short numerical vector of uniform format. A shared module then receives the available vectors and predicts the representation of the masked type, thereby training the model to connect structure with function. In property‑prediction tasks on small subsets, Mol‑JEPA achieved lower mean absolute error than competing methods, and its advantage widened as test molecules became more structurally distinct from the training set. On public temporal splits of the TabICLv2 benchmark (a tabular‑data model), Mol‑JEPA was sometimes outperformed in both MAE and head‑to‑head comparisons. Random splits can place molecules sharing a core scaffold in both training and test, leading to overly optimistic estimates; the authors note that evaluating on structurally distan
5 ·
Ссылка
click to show
Magnetite nanodiscs trigger astrocyte‑specific calcium response in mouse hippocampus On 19 August the authors posted a preprint describing an experiment in which mice received magnetite nanodiscs coated with an antibody that binds the astrocyte surface protein GLAST, injected into the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. Applying alternating magnetic fields of 25–28–50 mT produced a statistically larger intracellular calcium response in astrocytes than hematite particles of the same shape; the calcium signal was monitored by fiber photometry of a genetically encoded calcium‑sensitive reporter. Between the second and fifth week after a single injection, magnetite discs elicited a stronger astrocyte response than the hematite control, whereas mice expressing the reporter in neurons showed no difference between the two materials. The method builds on earlier work from 2022 that used antibody‑functionalized magnetic particles moved by strong field gradients and a 2025 open coil for weak alternating fields developed by Po‑Han Chang’s group; three Science studies have linked astrocyte calcium signals to neural network state switching, allowing causal tests. 🔗 Read original →
8 ·
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown. Then blank line, then body paragraphs short (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores .... We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No added commentary. We need to identify important facts: DARPA preparing Firefox program for 100-channel neurointerface without surgery, date: September 1 2026 meeting. Also: goal: system reads cortex signals with light through intact skull. Noninvasive coherent optical system already developed records neural signals at cortical depth in humans. Firefox to expand to multi-channel interface. Agency set path to 100 channels, spatial resolution 50 micrometers, temporal 100 microseconds. Program 36 months, three yearly phases; results checked by independent partner. Firefox divided into two related engineering tasks: dynamic scanning to steer light to several brain areas; other task: process large measurement stream: seeking architectures beyond ordinary digital data processing. Same physical difficulty as completed program N3: light, sound, electromagnetic signals scatter and attenuate passing through skin, skull, brain tissue. N3 set benchmark: work with 16 independent channels in volume of neural tissue 16 mm³ and temporal accuracy up to 50 milliseconds. Firefox builds on this problem and sets new measurement parameters. We need to wrap key numbers/dates etc in . Choose maybe: September 1 2026, 100 channels, 50 micrometers, 100 microseconds, 36 months, three yearly phases, 16 channels, 16 mm³, 50 milliseconds. That's many; we need at most 4-5. So we need to be selective: maybe highlight date, 100 channels, spatial resolution 50 µm
5 ·
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news into English, format with headline line under 90 chars, then blank line, then body paragraphs short (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts (key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates) in double asterisks, at most 4-5 per post. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores. We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No added commentary. No source link. We need to identify important facts: $40 млн, date 25 августа (August 25), Highland Europe fund, doubling team in Lausanne, opening office with lab in London Q4 2026, Claude campaign 1,320 mini-proteins for 15 targets, Anthropic, Twist Bioscience, first data ~21 days, quote. We need to wrap key numbers etc in . Choose maybe: $40 million, August 25, Highland Europe, Q4 2026, 1,320 mini-proteins, 15 targets, 21 days. That's 7, but limit 4-5. Need to be selective. Perhaps choose: $40 million, August 25, Q4 2026, 1,320 mini-proteins, 21 days. That's 5. Also need company names? They are important but maybe not wrap. Could wrap Highland Europe? But we already have 5. Could replace one. Let's decide: important facts: funding amount, date, fund name, expansion timeline, Claude campaign size, first data time. That's 6. Need max 5. Could combine fund name with amount? Not. Choose: $40 million, August 25, Highland Europe, Q4 2026, 21 days. Then we omit 1,320 mini-proteins and 15 targets? But they are facts. Could wrap them in double asterisks as well but limit. Maybe we can wrap 1,320 mini-proteins and 15 targets together as one fact? Eg "1,320 mini-proteins across 15 targets". That counts as one wrapped fact. Then we have: $40 million, August 25, Highland Europe, Q4 2026, 1,320 mini-proteins across 15 targets, 21 days => 6. Need 5 max. Could drop fund name? But fund is important. Could drop date? Date is important. Could drop Q4 2026? Maybe less important than others? But expansion
10 ·
Ссылка
click to show
We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No added commentary. Identify important facts: "26 августа" date, "Рамез Наам", "Дарио Амодеи", "мощный ИИ может дать биологии следующие 100 лет прогресса за 5–10 лет", "четырёх признаках", maybe numbers: 100 years, 5–10 years, four criteria. Also maybe "Go" result immediate, etc. But we need at most 4-5 double asterisks. Choose key numbers: date (26 August), 100 years, 5–10 years, four criteria. That's four. We need to wrap them in . Ensure not whole sentence. Citations: There's mention of essay "Machines of Loving Grace" by Amodei. Also maybe mention of review of AI agents for bio labs? Not a journal citation. The essay is a reference; we can wrap in single underscores: Machines of Loving Grace. Also maybe mention of "review of AI agents for bio labs" but not a journal. We'll just underscore the essay title. We need to preserve all facts exactly; translate. Let's draft. Headline: something like "Ramez Naam Links AI Speed in Biology to Organism Response". Under 90 chars. Now body paragraphs. Paragraph 1: On August 26, Ramez Naam discussed Dario Amodei's forecast: powerful AI could deliver biology’s next 100 years of progress in just 5–10 years. Naam says the pace depends on how quickly an experiment returns a clear result tied to a real goal. Paragraph 2: He proposes evaluating a task by four criteria: can success be distinguished from error without mistake; is there enough
9 ·
Ссылка
click to show
Remote-Controlled Neuroimplant Delivers Light and Drugs Via Internet Researchers in Chicago demonstrated a neuroimplant that can be operated from anywhere via the internet. They remotely controlled a device implanted in the brain of a laboratory rat located in Daejeon, South Korea. The implant functions in real time, turning on stimulation or drug delivery with a simple web command. The platform combines optogenetics and microfluidics, allowing neurons to be activated by light or inhibited while drugs are precisely injected. By eliminating bulky tethers and external hardware, it removes the observer effect and reduces stress on the animals. Inside the chip sits an electrochemical micropump: applying voltage triggers electrolysis, generating gas that pushes the drug from its reservoir; cutting the current lets the gas recombine, resetting the system. Dosing and the frequency of light pulses from a micro-LED are adjusted through a web interface, and the drug cartridge attaches magnetically for easy replacement or refilling without additional surgery. Stability and durability were validated in a four-week experiment on rats. In addiction studies, scientists remotely delivered cocaine to the Nucleus Accumbens while simultaneously suppressing neural activity with light, successfully curbing addictive behavior. Looking ahead, Korean developers aim to link such IoT implants with AI to close the loop—letting algorithms read brain states and automatically administer the appropriate drug or light pulse for conditions such as depression, neurodegenerative disorders, or epilepsy. 🔗 Read original →
13 ·
C
Ссылка
click to show
Enhancement.bio replaces T1–T10 scale with S–E evidence letter for gene 🔗 Read original →
7 ·
Open in Telegram Feed t.me/s Каталог площадок Искать в ChatCrawler

A snapshot of an open public feed from the search index ChatCrawler — “Google for public Telegram”; refreshed as the venue is crawled. Times are UTC.

Public content only, official Telegram API. About · FAQ · What we do not do · Remove a page · Catalog