17 August 2026
Pixietext not yet in the index
Believe he’s dead?
The whole Arday story is little more than a bad soap subplot, but it refreshes racial animus in Britain to stop people noticing what they ought to notice.
id 1498181379Фотография
It's seems the DNA is showing the Palestinians are closer to old time biblical Hebrews...
Current "Jews" were Turks, who appeared to have taken on Judaism, under King Khan Bulan around 740 CE...
Danieltext not yet in the index
Why do you feel they removed the soil down to a depth of 10 inches, then paved it over, that soil alone would have weighed tonnes in weight, why bother if nothing happened.
Pixietext not yet in the index
The person committed suicide. The man is probably walking around with a haircut, a different wardrobe and the identity documents of a new person.
id 1498181379Видео
Makes me wonder if she is part of the psyop. Child actress, media family... the MKULTRA traumatic conditioning would not permit this type of revelation, especially as the child sex trafficking would have started decades ago.
I think she may have been "retired" as her youth has faded and her acting is not top-of-class. She may respawn as a useful nobody in the background machinery; watch for it.
Set FreeWhy do you feel they removed the soil down to a depth of 10 inches, then paved it over, that soil alone would have weighed tonnes in weight, why bother if nothing happened.
That would also mean no samples could ever be taken for any purpose, to prove or disprove the presence of blood or ballistics or the presence of fake squib blood even. It was just bulldozed which goes against everything for a normal investigation so the standard police were clearly side lined.
id 1498181379Фотография
Anyone remember when BBC radio 4 used to role out this nasty piece of work on a weekly basis to opine on issues of morality and conduct? It was maybe 30 to 40 years ago now. Michael Gove also appeared at the same time on the same programme. Can't remember what it was called. Used to be from about 9am to 10am I think.
DanielThat would also mean no samples could ever be taken for any purpose, to prove or disprove the presence of blood or ballistics or the presence of fake squib blood even. It was just bulldozed which goes against everything for a normal investigation so the standard police were clearly side lined.
I agree, the guy in charge said they found the screwdriver on the roof but he doesn't have it on his body cam as it ran out after 23 Minutes. They are designed to record for 12 Hours. When the defence at the pre-trial asked him if he gave permission to pave over the area he said "No", when he was asked when he first learnt of it, he replied "Watching it happen on TV" clearly there is something very wrong with the case
Set FreeI agree, the guy in charge said they found the screwdriver on the roof but he doesn't have it on his body cam as it ran out after 23 Minutes. They are designed to record for 12 Hours. When the defence at the pre-trial asked him if he gave permission to pave over the area he said "No", when he was as
Yes I think we can completely discount the case against that bloke alleged to have conducted an assassination. He posed in photos that contained obvious symbology. Who knows what is really going on but a bit like 9/11 we may not know what did happen exactly but we know that what they are saying as the official story is total nonsense. The claim that he was offed to stop talking about Israel and the jews behaviour doesn't really stand up to me. Seems way too convenient with some handy video clips. Who cares what he says when there are plenty of others talking in the same way. I don't see Charlie Kirks opinions if they were independent and genuine as being so important that he had to be offed. On the other hand if he was a central casting operative that they wanted to retire this is the only way that can really be done otherwise he would have to live the rest of his life in this character. All goes back to the central point of was that a credible event. If he participated in any way, such as closing his eyes and tensing just before the supposed shot then he was involved in a performance. If he did then he had to have a credible reason for participating that made sense to him. I suppose he could have been duped to participate and offed later but once the performance had been executed theres no real need. He has been removed from the public stage and cannot return. Listen to all the points Eric Coppolino went through which I won't even attempt to summarise here.
id 1498181379Фотография
My wife's friend knows people who work at Cambridge University and they all say he was a fucking moron
id 1498181379Фотография
He looks like the sort of man child that enjoys playing with Lego but never finishes the models because he ate all the blue parts and stuck the green ones up his bum.
DanielYes I think we can completely discount the case against that bloke alleged to have conducted an assassination. He posed in photos that contained obvious symbology. Who knows what is really going on but a bit like 9/11 we may not know what did happen exactly but we know that what they are saying as t
I am not sure if you realise how big Charlie Kirk actually was, I mean no disrespect to you in what I say, but Charlie Kirk was massive, he was undoubtedly the reason Trump got elected, his organisation TPUSA would hold debate sessions aft his many colleges they could, Kirk never backed down from a question. He had access to the White House, quite literally an open door. In one of the last times he went there was in July 2025 when he got heated with Trump telling him to NOT invade Iran for ANY reason, a parting shot recorded by Joe Kent was as he emerged from the Oval Office Kirk saw Kent and shouted to him, "Try to get through to your Boss, NOT to invade Iran, or will be a betrayal". His Boss was Tulsi Gabbard.
Kirk had huge influence and was undoubtley Pro Israel, no question, however that did start to turn just after the October 7th attacks by Hamas. He appeared on the PBD Podcast, the guy who has just moderated the Owens Wilson "debate". On the podcast Kirk brought up the belief that there was a stand down order by the Israel military, his belief that they were g of to ethnically cleanse Gaza, these were shocking claims from someone like Kirk on that specific Podcast.
The other issue that pushed him further away from the Jewish influence was platforming Tucker Carlson who from the TPUSA conference stage, tore into Kirks donors, taking the piss out of them basically. He then on the same bill platformed the Left leaning Spanish Smith from the "Part of the problem" podcast, to debate Josh Hammer, a Zionist extremist, Kirk moderated the debate and Dave Smith smashed Deluded, it was embarrassing to watch. This upset a LOT of donors.
Leaked text messages after his death showed he was going to bring Carlson back and Candace Owens, this was the message where he said he was leaving the Israel cause as they fullfil all the stereotypes, he had lost a huge donation, around $3 Million for hosting Carlson.
I don't think he would have walked away from supporting Israel e
Set FreeI am not sure if you realise how big Charlie Kirk actually was, I mean no disrespect to you in what I say, but Charlie Kirk was massive, he was undoubtedly the reason Trump got elected, his organisation TPUSA would hold debate sessions aft his many colleges they could, Kirk never backed down from a
Kirk was a rally point for the antiZionist conservatives.
TPUSA was a sorting mechanism.
Followers from shooting onward are identified as malleable drones.
Set FreeI am not sure if you realise how big Charlie Kirk actually was, I mean no disrespect to you in what I say, but Charlie Kirk was massive, he was undoubtedly the reason Trump got elected, his organisation TPUSA would hold debate sessions aft his many colleges they could, Kirk never backed down from a
I've seen too much dodgy stuff of him. Is ANY politician in the USA the real deal? It is all smoke and mirrors and theatre in the US as in most countries now. Look at the Fauci staged performance trial that is a million miles from the truth. Still I go back to........was the alleged gunning down / assassination / shooting of Charlie Kirk a real event?. Was that a shooting out of the blue that the people around him knew nothing about. Did he knowingly participate in the event? Has anyone done a deep dive on Mr Kirk to see if his existence stacks up from birth to alleged death? Where is his birth certificate? Where is his death certificate? Where is his autopsy? We have zero evidence that he is dead. People including many awake people still just accept being told things with no evidence. All you have is that you were told he had died and then he vanished. That's it. I say the event was a staged event. There is a mass of evidence to show all the incongruities, and strangeness of this together with all the symbology and references they love so much. Even if someone wanted to assassinate him why do it there? It was done for effect. If it was a real shot all sorts could have gone wrong from missing, to hitting others, to being seen. Why not off him outside a restaurant, in the street, at close range, in the dark? This was done for effect, to create a traumatic event..........it was theatre. Have you listened to Eric Coppolino on this?
Set FreeI am not sure if you realise how big Charlie Kirk actually was, I mean no disrespect to you in what I say, but Charlie Kirk was massive, he was undoubtedly the reason Trump got elected, his organisation TPUSA would hold debate sessions aft his many colleges they could, Kirk never backed down from a
Even I knew Trump was going to try and take down / go to war with Iran when he got in the second time. That was fairly obvious. It just needed some pretext. I told a group I am on exactly that several years ago and they all said he wouldn't start any more wars and I was nuts. That was baked into the cake from day one as far as I'm concerned given the expectations of all his donors. Kirk was irrelevant to that if indeed he was anything more than a puppet from central casting.