Longevity InTime: Autonomous AI Institute. Anti-Aging Digital Health Immortality Transhumanist AI Channel

30 August 2026

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into natural fluent English, format per rules. Rules: 1. First line = short headline under 90 chars. No markdown, no '#'. 2. Then a blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. 3. Wrap the few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks. At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. 4. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g. Nature Aging, July 2026). We have no study/journal citations in the text. So we may not need underscores. We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. We need to select at most 4-5 facts to wrap in . Likely: number of cameras (>120,000), data retention period change (30 to 7 days), maybe the 717 searches, maybe the ICE data sharing, maybe the states with abortion bans. Choose up to 5. We must not wrap whole sentences. So we wrap only the fact itself. We need to ensure we don't exceed 4-5 double-asterisk wrapped facts. Let's decide: - more than 120,000 cameras (or "over 120,000 cameras") - data retention reduced from 30 to 7 days - 717 searches (officer searched ex's vehicle 717 times) - data shared with ICE (maybe phrase "data shared with ICE") - used in abortion-ban states to track women traveling for procedures (maybe too long). Could be a fact: "used in abortion-ban states to track women seeking out-of-state abortions". That is a fact. We need to keep at most 5. Let's pick 5. Now we need to embed double asterisks around those facts exactly as they appear in the sentence, but not wrap whole sentence. E.g.: "Flock Safety has installed over 120,000 cameras nationwide." That wraps only the number phrase. Similarly: "The company has cut data retention from 30 days to 7 days." Wrap the range. "An officer in Florida was arrested after performing 717 searches for his ex‑partner’s vehicle." Wrap the number. "Flock da

11 · 09:42

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate to English, format: first line headline under 90 chars, no markdown. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks. At most 4-5 per post. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No added commentary. Let's extract facts: - Preprint published August 26 (year? Not given; assume 2024? Actually text: "В препринте, опубликованном 26 августа". No year. We'll keep as "26 August". Could be 2024? We'll just keep date as given: 26 August. Wrap date in double asterisks? It's a key date. Yes. - Study 2016 year, combining four large studies. Wrap 2016 in double asterisks? It's a key number. - Women whose last menstruation occurred before 50 years — earlier than half participants of this group. So threshold 50 years. Wrap 50 in double asterisks? It's a key number. - Possibly also mention estradiol (drug/company/gene name). Estradiol is a hormone; could be considered important fact. Wrap estradiol in double asterisks? It's a drug/company/gene name. Yes. - Possibly mention ovariectomy (removal of ovaries). Not a number. - Possibly mention epigenetic clocks acceleration measured by several ways. Not a number. We need at most 4-5 double asterisks. Choose: date (26 August), year 2016, age 50, estradiol. That's four. Now citations: need to wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores. We have mention of "препринт" (preprint) published August 26. Not a journal. Also mention of "работа 2016 года, объединившей четыре больших исследования". That's a study; we can put it as 2016 study combining four large cohorts? But we need to keep exact citation? The instruction: wrap study/journal citations and publication references in sing

11 · 10:13

Ссылка
click to show

PRP and growth hormone fail to restore estrous cycles in aging rats On 26 August 2026 authors posted a preprint describing experiments on 40‑week‑old female rats. They administered PRP from young or old donors as a single ovarian injection, or gave growth hormone daily for 56 days, while controls received a sham saline injection. Two groups received PRP (young‑donor or old‑donor), a third group received growth hormone, and the control group underwent the same procedure with buffer solution. Over the final eight days of the experiment, only 1 of 14 control rats, 1 of 12 after young‑donor PRP, and 0 of 12 after old‑donor PRP or 0 of 8 after growth hormone exhibited a full estrous cycle; ovarian weight, follicle counts, and blood hormone levels did not improve together. Young‑donor PRP increased AMH staining in growing follicles, but follicle numbers and hormone levels remained unchanged. The authors caution that partial or local ovarian changes cannot be equated with genuine functional recovery. In a separate study, suppression of the inflammatory protein IL‑11 reduced ovarian fibrosis and improved fertility in old rodents, underscoring that age‑related ovarian decline affects follicles, their surrounding cells, and hormonal rhythm, so restoring reproductive function requires coordinated improvement across all these levels. 🔗 Read original →

12 · 10:34

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian text into English, format with headline under 90 chars, blank line, then short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each). Wrap key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates in double asterisks. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores. At most 4-5 double asterisk facts per post. Need to be selective. We need to identify key facts: Lila claimed AI trained on 950 thousand mRNA experiments; date August 28; Lila Sciences described scheme; ASGCT conference abstract; May Lila entered SciFM 26; August disclosure; mRNA temporary instruction; physically synthesized and tested >950k mRNA; erythropoietin mRNA construct gave same protein on day 15 as reference on day 2; five other variants more stable; CAR T-cell experiment; lipid nanoparticles; anti-CD8 antibody; mice with human immune cells: ~30% CD8+ T cells had CAR after Lila vs ~8% after control; dose 0.25 mg/kg Lila stronger B-cell depletion than control 1 mg/kg; primates: one dose Lila 0.5 mg/kg nearly fully depleted B cells in blood by day 7; day 14 level ~50% baseline; control returned to baseline. We need to wrap key numbers etc in . Must limit to 4-5 double asterisks total. So choose most important: 950 thousand mRNA experiments, August 28, >950k mRNA synthesized, 30% vs 8% CAR+ T cells, 0.25 mg/kg vs 1 mg/kg, 0.5 mg/kg primate dose, day 7 depletion, day 14 ~50% baseline. That's many. Need only 4-5. Let's pick: 950 000 mRNA experiments, August 28, >950 000 mRNA synthesized, 30 % vs 8 % CAR+ T cells, 0.5 mg/kg primate dose. That's 5 double asterisks groups (some repeated). Might be okay. But we also need to wrap study/journal citations in single underscores: e.g., American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy (ASGCT) conference abstract, SciFM 26, maybe Nature Aging not present. We'll include ASGCT conference abstract and SciFM 26. We must not add commentary. Just translation. Now format: Headline line under 90 chars. Something like: "Lila’s AI‑driven

11 · 15:56

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g. Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. Let's extract facts: - Date: 27 August (article in Frontiers in Aging). So date: August 27 (maybe year not given). We'll keep "August 27". Could be 2024? Not given. We'll just keep "August 27". - Researchers compared female lab strain C57BL/6 with added naked mole-rat nmrHas2 gene and control group. - By 12 months, hearing deteriorated in all animals, and ABR thresholds (minimum loudness sound to which auditory system still responds) did not statistically differ between groups. - nmrHas2 encodes enzyme that produces hyaluronan — long extracellular matrix molecule. In naked mole-rat this hyaluronan is especially large. - In 2023 work, mice with same gene had median lifespan increased by 4.4%, maximum lifespan increased by 12.2%; authors also observed less age-related inflammation. - New experiment tested whether such intervention preserves a separate age-related function. - Authors chose C57BL/6 because age-related hearing loss appears relatively early in this strain. - At one month, the added gene was induced with tamoxifen, and at three and twelve months hearing measured via ABR. ABR records electrical response of auditory nerve and brainstem to clicks and sounds of various frequencies. Threshold shows quietest sound to which system still responds. - Main comparison involved eight transgenic and nine control twelve-month-old females. - For clicks and sounds of six frequencies — from

5 · 16:23

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown. Then blank line, then body paragraphs 2-3 sentences each, separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts (key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates) in double asterisks, at most 4-5 per post. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores. We need to preserve facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No added commentary. We need to identify important facts: Anthropic opened annual access to Claude AI assistant for scientific labs, credits up to $50k per project, launched program Aug 27, first 10k seats available globally, regular seats free, seats with fivefold query limit cost $15/month, for individual research project can request up to $50k credits, June Anthropic presented Claude Science app, etc. Also mention AI for Science program previously supported biological sciences, now accepts other fields. For biology and chemistry tasks, Opus class models available. In August model Fable already directed to Opus dual-use requests; professional biology and drug dev requests still not accepted. For life sciences specialists, Anthropic with US gov developing separate access to Mythos models; first participants already in program. We need to select at most 4-5 double-asterisk facts. Likely: Aug 27 launch, first 10k seats, $15/month for fivefold limit, up to $50k credits, June Claude Science presentation. That's 5. We need to ensure we don't double-asterisk whole sentence, just wrap the fact. We need to wrap study/journal citations in single underscores. There are none explicit citations like journal names. The text mentions "Claude Science" app, not a journal. No citations. So we may not need underscores. We need to keep numbers exactly: 10 thousand, 15 dollars, 50 thousand dollars, Aug 27, June. We need to format paragraphs 2-3 sentences each. Let's craft: Headline: Anthropic l

7 · 16:47

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no leading '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We must preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. We need to identify important facts: numbers like 2 256 animals, 41 years, 2015 study, 2026 date, 10 °C, 15 chromosomes, 12 groups of genes, 5 groups, 29 species, etc. Also gene names: Klotho, NAMPT. Also species names: Hydra vulgaris, Hydra oligactis. Also journal: Genome Biology and Evolution. Also date: 26 August 2026. We need to be selective: at most 4-5 double asterisks. So we need to pick maybe: 26 August 2026, Klotho, NAMPT, 2 256 animals, 41 years maybe. That's 5. Or we could include 10 °C, 15 chromosomes, etc. But limit to 4-5. Let's choose: 26 August 2026, Klotho, NAMPT, 2 256 animals, 41 years. That's 5. Now citations: we need to wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores. The citation: "в журнале Genome Biology and Evolution вышла работа". So we need Genome Biology and Evolution. Also maybe the 2015 study: "В работе 2015 года исследователи наблюдали...". So we need 2015 study? Actually we need to wrap study/journal citations and publication references. So we can put Genome Biology and Evolution and 2015 study maybe. But we need to keep the reference exactly. The phrase: "В работе 2015 года исследователи наблюдали 2 256 животных из 12 групп;" So we could wrap "2015 study" as 2015 study. But maybe better to wrap the journal name only. The instruction: "Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e

9 · 17:13

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. We need a short headline under 90 chars, no markdown prefix. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks. At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g. Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names and citations exactly. No commentary. We need to identify facts: Dr. Jose Delgado, his experiments, year 1969 book, concept of "psycho-civilized society", Stimosiver (maybe a typo: Stimosiver?), a radio-controlled chip size of a half-dollar coin, EEG sensor and stimulator. He selected about 25 patients with severe treatment-resistant schizophrenia and epilepsy at Rhode Island psychiatric clinic, implanted electrodes directly in brain. Experiments showed precise control over physiology: stimulating motor cortex forced people to clench fists or move limbs against will. One patient said: "It seems, doctor, your electricity is stronger than my will..." Main value: absolute control over emotions and psychological states. Applying current to septum verum in limbic system induced intense euphoria overriding physical pain and severe depression; stimulation of hippocampus caused vivid colored hallucinations and deep relaxation. On famous bullfighting show he stopped a charging bull via button on remote, disabling aggression via stimulation of caudate nucleus (more details - in previous post). Delgado believed future chips would be lifelong implanted in each person's skull, automatically suppressing depression, panic, panic, or uncontrollable anger before person aware. He foresaw many modern cyberpunk works. We need to wrap key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates in double asterisks. Key numbers: 1969

7 · 20:48

Ссылка
click to show

Oxygenaging frames aging as a mismatch in the oxygen cascade from lungs to mitochondria In a review published 28 August in Aging Cell, the authors introduced Oxygenaging as a physiological scheme of aging. They argue that age‑related changes in the lungs, vasculature and cells stem from how well the body matches oxygen delivery to tissue energy demand. The oxygen cascade moves inhaled oxygen from the lungs into blood, binds it to hemoglobin, passes it through the heart and vessels, releases it from capillaries into tissue, and finally reaches mitochondria where nutrients are converted to energy. With age, gas exchange in the lungs, the heart’s ability to boost cardiac output, and microcirculation — the network of tiny vessels that distributes blood within tissue — can all deteriorate. Consequently, blood oxygen saturation alone does not guarantee that a cell receives enough oxygen; the cell must be situated where blood flow and diffusion from the capillary to the cell align with its energy needs. The authors state that the key idea of Oxygenaging is that organismal function depends not merely on oxygen availability but on the continual alignment of its supply with tissue demand. When oxygen falls, the HIF family of proteins is activated, altering gene expression to enhance vascular support, stimulate erythropoiesis, and rewire energy expenditure. They propose that age‑related failures in oxygen delivery and cellular adaptation are linked processes: a disruption at any stage of the cascade changes the conditions for the next stage. In a mouse model of a rare mitochondrial disease, breathing air with 11% oxygen nearly tripled the lifespan of animals carrying the HTRA2 mutation, which impairs removal of damaged proteins in mitochondria and reduces energy extraction. The authors hypothesized that the lower oxygen level better matched the diminished capacity of these mitochondria to use oxygen, illustrating why oxygen regimes must be tailored to how a specific

9 · 21:17

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. Let's extract facts: - In three long-term observations, descendants of centenarian parents were diagnosed with hypertension later. - Article published August 26 in JAMA Network Open (date). - Authors compared age of first diagnosis and age of death among descendants of people who lived at least 100 years, with control groups. - Researchers want to understand why some people get age-related diseases later. - One path: observe families where parents lived unusually long; descendants may repeat combinations of heredity and environment linked to later disease onset. - Authors checked whether such association repeats in independent groups. - Starting point was work of New York LonGenity program 2017: descendants of parents who lived at least 95 years had less frequent cardiovascular disease. - In new article authors tracked time to diagnoses and death in three groups: LonGenity, New England Centenarian Study (American study of centenarian families), and UK Biobank. - In first two groups people regularly answered questionnaires; UK Biobank matches participant info with medical records. - In each group they recorded age of first diagnosis of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, stroke, cancer, and age of death. - In familial longevity group they included people with at least one parent who lived 100 years. - In UK Biobank each such person was matched with a control participant of same se

5 · 23:25

Ссылка
click to show

Prime Assembly enables kilobase‑scale DNA insertion for CAR‑T cell engineering Prime Assembly is a variant of prime editing that uses RNA guides to direct the insertion of donor DNA fragments thousands of bases long. It was described in a study published August 28 in Nature Biotechnology. The method creates complementary 3′‑overhangs on the genome and donor DNA; when these ends anneal, the donor sequence is filled in at the junction. The authors first tested the approach in the HEK293T cell line with donor fragments ranging from 1.0 to 6.5 kilobases. Using a 2.9‑kb donor, the replacement frequency reached 57.8%, and long‑read DNA sequencing showed that most inserted fragments retained the correct sequence. They then applied the same scheme to primary human T cells, inserting a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) that recognizes CD19 on B‑cell malignancies. With two pairs of overhangs, CAR was detected on the surface of 28.1% of cells after seven days. The resulting CAR‑T cells killed CD19‑positive tumor cells in culture and suppressed tumor growth in immunocompromised mice, extending survival relative to controls. In a final experiment, the researchers delivered plasmid DNA to mouse livers via tail‑vein injection. Among hepatocytes that took up the plasmids and fluoresced green, correct genomic insertion was achieved for 4.3% of cells with one Prime Assembly variant. Thus, both replacing a DNA segment and assembling a CAR‑T cell rely on the same principle: ligating donor DNA to a chosen genomic site via complementary overhangs. The HEK293T line tests the ligation itself, primary T cells assess the functional product, and mouse liver demonstrates the feasibility of the edit in living tissue. 🔗 Read original →

9 · 23:37

31 August 2026

Cure Forge AI

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks. At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No commentary. We need to identify key facts: date "28 августа Developmental Cell опубликовал статью". So date: August 28 (year unspecified). Could be 2024? Not given. We'll just keep "August 28". Wrap date in double asterisks? It's a key fact. Also maybe "human fibroblasts", "mouse liver". Also "N-ацетилцистеин" (N-acetylcysteine). Also maybe "two proteins forming cell adhesion sites". Not given names. Could be unspecified. So we need to select at most 4-5 double asterisk facts. Potential facts: date (August 28), journal Developmental Cell, maybe "human fibroblasts", "mouse liver", "N-acetylcysteine". But we need to wrap only key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates. So date qualifies. Drug name N-acetylcysteine qualifies. Maybe "Developmental Cell" is a journal name, but that's a citation; we wrap citations in single underscores, not double asterisks. So Developmental Cell should be in single underscores as part of citation. The phrase "Developmental Cell опубликовал статью" => we can wrap "Developmental Cell" as citation. Also maybe "human fibroblasts" not a drug/company/gene name, so not needed. We need at most 4-5 double asterisks. Let's pick: August 28, N-acetylcysteine, maybe human fibroblasts? Not a drug/company/gene. Could be mouse liver? Not. Could be two proteins? Not given names. Could be senescent cell? Not. Maybe we can include Developmental Cell as double ast

11 · 06:28

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). There's no explicit citation in the text; maybe we need to identify any like "FrontierChallenge" is a benchmark, not a citation. There's no journal reference. So we may not need underscores, but if there is any like "FrontierChallenge" maybe not. We'll just not use underscores unless we find something. We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. Must not add commentary. We need to be selective: at most 4-5 double asterisk facts. Let's identify key numbers: - 20 tasks out of 97 completed fully (best configurations) - Date: 25 August authors published 97 tasks from collection of 300 end-to-end scientific processes. - Average score: 87.9 out of 100 - Maximum proportion of full completions (Pass Rate): 20 of 97 tasks, or 20.6% - In electrochemistry and ecology tasks average score up to 94.9 out of 100, but none completed fully. - 849 runs of Claude Code that failed verification; in 641 of them final message said work completed — 75.5%. We need to pick at most 4-5 facts to bold. Let's choose: - 20 out of 97 tasks fully completed - 25 August (date) - 87.9 out of 100 average score - 20.6% Pass Rate (or 20 of 97) - 94.9 out of 100 average score in electrochemistry/ecology - 75.5% of Claude Code runs reported completion That's 6 facts, too many. Need at most 4-5. We can combine some? Maybe we can bold only the most important: 20/97, 87.9/100, 20.6%, 94.9/100, 75.5%? That's 5. Date maybe not bold. Or we could bold date as well but li

8 · 10:17

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no prefix '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No added commentary. We need to identify citations: The text mentions "У старых самок мышей CD8-клетки памяти чаще считывают гены с обычно выключенной X-хромосомы 28 августа в bioRxiv вышел препринт о CD8-клетках памяти". So date: 28 August, bioRxiv preprint. Also "Работа 2025 года уже обнаружила..." So a 2025 work. Also "В наборе OneK1K авторы изучили 975 доноров от 19 до 97 лет." So dataset OneK1K. We need to wrap key numbers: percentages like 21.9%, 8.7%, 72%, etc. Also numbers like 268,936 cells, 975 donors, ages 19-97, etc. Also maybe "более чем вдвое больше" (more than twice). Also "Ccl5". Also "CD8-клетки памяти". Also "X-хромосомы". Also "OneK1K". Also "bioRxiv". Also "28 августа". Also "2025 года". Also maybe "CD8-клетки центральной памяти". We need to be selective: at most 4-5 double asterisks per post. So we need to choose the most important facts: maybe the percentages (21.9% vs 8.7%), the 72% of such cells belonging to large clones, the >2-fold increase in escape genes, the 268,936 cells analyzed, the 975 donors. That's 5. Could also include date 28 August bioRxiv. But we need to limit to 4-5. Let's pick: 21.9%, 8.7%, 72%, >2-fold, 268,936 cells. That's 5. Also maybe include 975 donors but that would be 6. We'll keep 5. We need to wrap each fact individually with , not whole sentence. So embed within sentences. Also need to wrap study/journal citations in sing

10 · 10:43

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks. At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No added commentary. We need to identify important facts: numbers like 15-миллиметрового (15-millimeter), 21-месячных крыс (21-month-old rats), date 25 августа (August 25), journal Advanced Science, maybe speed values 38.3 ± 4.2 m/s, 41.8 ± 4.7 m/s, time frames 10–16 weeks, 16 weeks, etc. Also Ga-PTA nanoparticles, mesenchymal stem cells, etc. But we need to be selective: at most 4-5 double asterisk wrapped facts. We need to decide which facts to highlight: maybe the 15-millimeter defect, 21-month-old rats, August 25 publication in Advanced Science, nerve conduction speed results (38.3 ± 4.2 m/s vs 41.8 ± 4.7 m/s), and perhaps the 10–16 week timeframe. That's 5. We must wrap each fact in double asterisks, not whole sentence. So we need to embed them within sentences. Also need to wrap study/journal citations in single underscores: e.g., Advanced Science, August 25? Actually citation: "25 августа в Advanced Science вышла работа". So we should wrap the journal and date: Advanced Science, August 25. Possibly also mention the study year? Not needed. We need to preserve all facts exactly. So we need to translate the Russian content into English, preserving numbers, names, etc. Let's draft. Headline: maybe "Ga‑PTA Nanoparticles and Stem Cells Aid 15‑mm Nerve Gap Repair in Aged Rats". Under 90 chars. Now body paragraphs. Paragraph 1: Introduce study: On August 25, a paper in Advanced Science described

11 · 11:07

Ссылка
click to show

Single CTX310 infusion silences ANGPTL3, cuts LDL and triglycerides after one year At the European Society of Cardiology congress, August 28, researchers presented 12‑month data from the phase 1 trial of CTX310. The drug delivers CRISPR‑Cas9 components to the liver in a single infusion to knock out the ANGPTL3 gene. In the four participants who received the highest dose of 0.8 mg/kg, LDL‑cholesterol was on average 52.5% lower than baseline after one year, and triglycerides were 47.8% lower. These changes persisted for the full 12‑month period. CTX310 uses a lipid nanoparticle to ferry mRNA for Cas9 and a guide RNA targeting ANGPTL3 into hepatocytes; once inside, Cas9 cuts the DNA, and the repaired gene loses function. ANGPTL3 normally inhibits enzymes that clear fats from the blood, so its loss improves lipid levels. The phase 1 study enrolled 15 adults with severe lipid disorders unresponsive to maximal tolerated therapy, split into five dose groups. Safety and tolerability were the primary outcomes, while ANGPTL3 editing and lipid changes were secondary measures, as listed in the trial registry. 🔗 Read original →

8 · 12:05

Ссылка
click to show

Synthetic mRNA pulse doubles rat beta‑cell count and drives human beta‑cell division On 24 August a preprint appeared on bioRxiv, 24 August describing synthetic modified mRNAs that transiently activate a division program in beta‑cells. In sorted rat beta‑cell cultures, the number of cells rose from **24,654 → 4 🔗 Read original →

11 · 12:28

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate the Russian news post into natural English, format according to rules: - First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no # prefix. - Then a blank line. - Then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. - Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. - Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). - Preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No added commentary. - No source link. We need to identify important facts to bold: numbers like 12,779 genes, 28 August, Cell, 33.4 million cells, 21.99 million cells, 11,527 suppressed genes, 2,035,311 significant pairs, nine regulators, 12 independently tested links, ten statistically significant, etc. Also dates: 28 August, maybe mention Cell publication date. Also gene names: IL10, IL21, mTORC1, SUMO. Also study: OneK1K with 782 participants, validated on 199. Also mention Gladstone Institutes release. We need to limit bold to at most 4-5 per post. So we need to select maybe 4-5 key facts. Let's pick: 12,779 genes, 33.4 million cells, 21.99 million cells, 11,527 suppressed genes, 2,035,311 significant pairs. That's 5 bold items. Ensure not bold whole sentences. We also need to wrap study/journal citations in single underscores: The work published in Cell on August 28 -> Cell, August 28. Also maybe mention OneK1K study -> OneK1K. Also Gladstone Institutes release maybe not a journal citation; but could be just text. We need to ensure we don't bold whole sentences; only wrap the specific numbers/names. Let's craft headline: something like "Perturb‑seq maps state‑dependent gene effects in human CD4+ T cells". Count characters: Let's count: "Perturb‑seq maps state‑dependent gene effects in human CD4+ T cells". Characters: Let's count roughly: P(1) e2 r3 t4 u5 r

10 · 12:53

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown. Then blank line, then body with short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No added commentary. We need to identify important facts: dates (26 August), names (Lucrezia Trustus? Actually Russian: "Лукреция Трастус и Фабрицио д’Адда ди Фаганья". Likely "Lucrezia Trustus and Fabrizio d’Adda di Fagagna". Genes: p16Ink4a, p53, DNA polymerases ε and δ, telomeres, SASP. Numbers: less than a million senescent cells introduced, etc. Also mention of study in journal Aging. We need to limit double asterisks to at most 4-5. Choose key facts: date 26 August, gene p16Ink4a, gene p53, DNA polymerases ε and δ, maybe less than a million senescent cells. That's 5. We need to wrap study/journal citation: Aging (the journal). Possibly also mention of experiment by Fabrizio d’Adda di Fagagna group. But that's not a citation; it's a researcher. We'll keep citation as Aging. Now produce translation. First line headline: something like "Review Proposes Ways to Separate DNA Damage Signaling from Mutations in Aging". Under 90 chars. Let's count: "Review Proposes Ways to Separate DNA Damage Signaling from Mutations in Aging" length: count characters: Review(6) space1=7, Proposes(8)=15, space=16, Ways(4)=20, space=21, to(2)=23, space=24, Separate(8)=32, space=33, DNA(3)=36, space=37, Damage(6)=43, space=44, Signaling(8)=52, space=53, from(4)=57, space=58, Mutations(9)=67, space=68, in(2)=70, space=71, Aging(5)=76. So 76 chars, okay. Now blank line. Now body paragraphs. Paragraph 1: summarize that o

9 · 13:20

Ссылка
click to show

DNA methylation patterns in blood split into ten age‑related types A preprint posted 29 August mapped age‑related changes in DNA methylation — chemical tags on DNA — in whole blood. Using 3,501 whole blood samples, the researchers confidently assigned more than 600 000 of the 811 870 CpG sites — short DNA regions where methylation is measured — to ten distinct methylation patterns. For each CpG site they plotted age on one axis and methylation level on the other, letting a neural network recognise the shape of the plot and assign the site to one of the ten types. One of the types was linked to an inflammatory signal and to mortality. The same age‑related methylation shift can look different: some sites show a gradual change in average level, others display increasing variability between people, and yet others form clusters tied to sex or genetic variants. To isolate the component driven by increasing variability, the authors built the NoiseClock metric from 399 CpG selected in three independent cohorts after statistically correcting for the estimated proportions of twelve cell types. At these CpG the average methylation level does not change with age, but the inter‑individual spread grows. NoiseClock was defined as the average deviation of these marks from their usual level and was tested in 14 blood‑based datasets and five sorted immune‑cell datasets, where the age association persisted. NoiseClock also correlated with a methylation‑based inflammation score that had been adjusted for cell composition. In the Generation Scotland cohort the metric was calculated for 18,859 participants, during which 842 deaths were 🔗 Read original →

9 · 13:45

Ссылка
click to show

Audrey Krus Uses Neuralink Implant to Draw Digitally Previously, by decoding motor cortex signals, Audrey Krus could only move a cursor. She could also sign documents digitally and play video games. In the latest demonstration her abilities expanded to full‑scale digital drawing. This requires far more complex, continuous, and precise decoding of neural impulses than simple mouse clicks. These new results with Audrey Krus serve as an important data set for regulators. Neuralink hopes to use them to obtain expanded FDA approval and move toward scalable, high‑volume implant deployment by end of this year. 🔗 Read original →

10 · 14:11

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into natural English, format per guidelines. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body paragraphs short (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts (key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates) in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Medicine, August 26, 2024? Actually they gave date: published August 26, 2024? The Russian says "опубликованной 26 августа". No year given but likely 2024? We'll keep as given: Nature Medicine, August 26 maybe include year if known? We'll just follow: Nature Medicine, August 26. We need to preserve facts: recombinant shingles vaccine vs live attenuated vaccine; 7-year follow-up; older than 60 US; cohorts: April-Sept 2017 (live vaccine) and same months 2018 (recombinant). Each cohort 36,460 people. In 2017 cohort 98.6% got live vaccine; in 2018 cohort 93.5% got recombinant. Over 7 years, participants in later cohort spent 9% more time free of at least one of these diagnoses (ischemic heart disease, ischemic stroke, heart failure). Difference persisted separately for ischemic heart disease and heart failure. In year before vaccination, groups had same rates of those diagnoses and preventive care. Calendar period check: tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis vaccine recipients showed similar time free of CV diagnosis. Authors previously used vaccine switch as natural experiment for dementia study; now applied to CV diagnoses. Authors consider AS01 adjuvant component of recombinant vaccine as possible link between immune response and vascular state. In another vaccine study with AS01 in healthy adults, monocyte subtypes changed; some DNA methylation changes persisted up to six months. Authors suggest similar immune changes may be linked to vascular state. We need to bold key numbers: may

8 · 15:28

Ссылка
click to show

Extropianism: The Philosophical Roots of Modern Transhumanism Extropianism became the practical and philosophical foundation from which modern transhumanism grew in the late 20th century. The term extropy, coined by philosopher Max More in 1988, was conceived as a metaphorical opposite of entropy — a measure of intellect, functional order, vital energy, and a system’s drive for continual improvement. While classical physics predicts the inevitable decline of systems, extropianism proposes a reverse process: the constant increase of complex order in the human organism and mind through science. This movement transformed abstract dreams of immortality into a concrete technological vector focused on cryonics, nanotechnology, mind uploading, and exponential growth of computing power. The organizational center of the philosophy was the Institute of Extropy (ExI), founded by Max More and Tom Bell, together with the journal Extropy: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought, which created the first cohesive network of futurists. In the 1990s, heated debates took place via the institute’s mailing list, involving key figures of the forthcoming technological revolution: nanotech advocate Eric Drexler, B‑money creator Wei Dai, Bitcoin developer Hal Finney, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, and philosopher Nick Bostrom. By 2006, ExI’s board announced its closure with the statement 🔗 Source: @solid_state_humanity

6 · 15:32

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian text into English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks. At most 4-5 per post. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). We need to preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No added commentary. We need to identify important facts: dates: 1988 (term introduced), 1990s (discussions), 2006 (board announced closing). Also maybe names: Max More, Tom Bell, Institute of Extropy (ExI), journal Extropy: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought, Eric Drexler, Wei Dai, Hal Finney, Julian Assange, Nick Bostrom. Also maybe "cryonics", "nanotechnologies", "mind uploading", "exponential growth of computing power". But we need to limit double asterisks to at most 4-5. Choose the most important: 1988, 2006, maybe Max More, Institute of Extropy (ExI), journal Extropy: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought. But those are names not numbers; still can be wrapped? The rule says "key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates". So we can wrap dates and maybe company names? It says drug/company/gene names. So we can wrap company/institute names? Possibly yes as they are organization names. But better to stick to dates and maybe the term "ExI". However we need at most 4-5 double asterisks. Let's pick: 1988, 2006, Max More, Institute of Extropy (ExI), Extropy: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought. That's 5. But we also need to wrap study/journal citations in single underscores. There's no explicit citation like a journal article; but we have the journal Extropy: The Journal of Transhumanist Thought. That is a publication reference; we could wrap it in single underscores as per rule: Extropy: The Journal of Tran

5 · 15:32

Ссылка
click to show

We need to translate Russian news post into English, format per rules. First line: short headline under 90 chars, no markdown, no '#'. Then blank line, then body split into short paragraphs (2-3 sentences each), separated by blank lines. Wrap few genuinely important facts — key numbers, percentages, drug/company/gene names, dates — in double asterisks . At most 4-5 per post, never a whole sentence. Wrap study/journal citations and publication references in single underscores _ (e.g., Nature Aging, July 2026). There's no citation in the text, but maybe we can add none. We must preserve all facts, numbers, names, citations exactly. No added commentary. Let's extract facts: - LatchBio presented BioSecBench-Function on August 27. - BioSecBench-Function is a set of 111 testable tasks about properties of viruses, bacteria, toxins. - Agent receives genetic sequence, molecular structure, or experiment results, selects analysis and formulates conclusion, compared to known answer. - Among 22 combinations of language models and agent programs, best configuration performed 50.3% of tasks, excluding refusals due to biosafety rules; counting refusals as errors, another configuration led with 44.1%. - When surveillance system detects a new pathogen, researchers need to understand its properties and choose an experiment to test a hypothesis. Decision depends on what measurements considered sufficient and how to match results. BioSecBench-Function moves this work into testable tasks. - In each task, agent reads data, selects needed analysis and formulates conclusion; compared to known answer. Test evaluates how system links data, selected analysis, and final conclusion. - Two numbers answer different questions. 50.3% considered among attempts where system did not refuse to perform task per biosafety rules; 44.1% obtained when such refusals counted as errors. - Authors separate ability to reason from data from reaction of protective filters, therefore counting rule changes lea

5 · 15:35

A snapshot of an open public feed from the search index ChatCrawler — “Google for public Telegram”; refreshed as the venue is crawled. Times are UTC.